Essay topics: Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Main reason to join the educational institutes is to study and get guidance on different area of life such as employment, interests, hobbies, new inventions, career etc. Some people think that academic institutions should carry the responsibility to guide the students not to enroll the courses in which they are likely to fail. I believe that choice to pursue the course should be left to students; however, institutions can suggest their observations.
People who believe that educational institutes should restrict the students for not allowing the study in the area where chance of success are less, have some valid points. Firstly, mostly institutes have vast no of years of experience to judge the student based on the capability and interest. It is commonly seen that some students have interests in particular field but not able to soak the pressure arise in that area. For instance, my nephew has keen interest in medicine but he does not study well, so his teacher advised him not to go for medicine course as it require extensive hard work. Secondly, institutes also invite the expert career counselor who can tell the students about different options which they rarely know and advice the best fit for them.
However, it is hard to do the assessment of every student in detailed manner and advise best course for him. There are number of instances where students failed in basic subjects but become master of subjects later. For example, Great scientist Edison was made unfit for elementary education but he invented electricity which was the most useful invention of that era. Students develop different choices in different stages of life and sometime students do not respond in the school environment in effective manner.
To conclude, academic institutes have large role to play in providing best education and guidance about area where students can succeed. But decision to study subjects should be the responsibility of student and guardian.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...s. Firstly, mostly institutes have vast no of years of experience to judge the stu...
^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'advise the best'.
Suggestion: advise the best
...of every student in detailed manner and advise best course for him. There are number of ins...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'providing the best'.
Suggestion: providing the best
...c institutes have large role to play in providing best education and guidance about area where...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 2260.96107784 73% => OK
No of words: 319.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15987460815 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69168216143 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548589341693 0.468620217663 117% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1034488354 57.8364921388 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 119.503703932 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 5.70786347227 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209862222809 0.218282227539 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768641170423 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485494412344 0.0701772020484 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140011807589 0.128457276422 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367849276338 0.0628817314937 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.