Essay topics Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with s

Essay topics:

Essay topics:
Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight.

The letter to the editor of the national aronautics magazine surmises that resources ought to be invested in unmanned space flight owing to the higher cost and risk associated with manned flights. The argument presented in the letter is based on the recent success of a series of unmanned space flights which revealed the immense potential of such automated flights in gathering information and minimizing risk to men and women in space. However, the argument is based on unwarrented assumptions which is not cogent enought to support the notion stated in the letter for the ensuing reasons.

One of the most imperative assumptions stated in the letter is the high cost and greater risk associated with manned space flight. Although it is true that sending peple is space flight is definitely riskier and requires much more investement in terms of their safety, fooding and everything else necessary to sustain life on such flights, it is not wise to deny the fact that whatever achievements we have today in the outer space in because of such flights and the very contributions of men and women. There have been many tests with and without people in such space flights in the history, but we recall the most important ones when people set their foot in to the outer space in a manned space flights. This is all because, people have their own thinking capacity, able to make decisions as quick as blinking an eye; manned flights are able to navigate their way into the vast outerspace based on experience and their own beliefs. Unmanned/automated space flights, by contrast, are able to fly into the space without people and letting them at risk; this, however, renders such flights unable to act as per situations and unable to cope up with unexpected harsh conditions in the space. Furthermore, using manned flights may not be as expensive as unmanned flights as we have been beleiving so far; if we consider the costs incurred for initial investement for experiments destroying a large number of valuable space flights, expenses related to researching the technology itself and using them in a perfect way for real may not even bring the desired outcomes to the people. Therefore, the assumptions made by the author of the letter does not hold water.

Another crucial concern that needs to be addressed is the recent series of success gained from unmanned space probes. The letter is quite vague since it does not states the nature of the success -- the unmanned probes could be successful in reaching the outer space, it could be discussing the value of the information that have been gathered, and there is also the potential that the unmanned probes are just in testing phase and the successes were referring to the successful testing on a particular aspect of the probe only. The letter apparently states the success of the unmanned probes as a possibility not as something which has been already achieved. The unmanned space probes may not be sufficient enough to gather the evidence from the space and more tests need to be conducted in the future which will require even more time and resources than it was needed for manned space flights. If these concerns are valid, then the assumptions presented in the argument by the author in his letter are unwarrented and not cogent enough since the sucess of the unmanned flights are not guarranteed, and it might instead become a burden, thereby implying that it is not wise to suggest the investment on unmanned space flight without concrete evidence.

Furthermore, the unmanned space flights take too much time and resources experiment and test their efficacy and obtain results to suppor their uses in outer space. It is highly likely that the probes which were successful in testing phase might take decades or even hundreds of years to successfully explore the vast outer space which would then require astonishingly large amount of resources and investment. Unmanned space probes could be something which is wasting the precious resources that could have been used to improve the manned flights and increase their safety in the space. There is still a lot of aspects which could instead promote and enhance the current manned flights; afterall, the success rate of manned flights have been well established from successful venture into the moon and other areas of space around the earth. For these reasons, the assumptions of the author are not valid and the argument is not articulate enough suppor the notion of increasing the investment on unmanned space flights.

In conclusion, the manned space flight could be more riskier and costly to observe at a glance, but their success cannot be negated as well. Instead of wasting valuable resources on unmanned space fliht

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional aronautics magazine surmises that resources ought to be invested in unmann...
^^
Line 3, column 699, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'flight'?
Suggestion: flight
...in to the outer space in a manned space flights. This is all because, people have their...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1389, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... investement for experiments destroying a large number of valuable space flights, expenses relate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1500, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a perfect way" with adverb for "perfect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ng the technology itself and using them in a perfect way for real may not even bring the desired...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: state
...letter is quite vague since it does not states the nature of the success -- the unmann...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
...letter is quite vague since it does not states the nature of the success -- the unmann...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 660, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ething which has been already achieved. The unmanned space probes may not be suffic...
^^^
Line 7, column 688, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
...and enhance the current manned flights; afterall, the success rate of manned flights hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'riskier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: riskier
...usion, the manned space flight could be more riskier and costly to observe at a glance, but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 43.0 19.6327345309 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 11.1786427146 277% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 102.0 55.5748502994 184% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3950.0 2260.96107784 175% => OK
No of words: 792.0 441.139720559 180% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98737373737 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.30495000532 4.56307096286 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58957755475 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 316.0 204.123752495 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.39898989899 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1226.7 705.55239521 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 36.0 22.8473053892 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.0257903227 57.8364921388 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.545454545 119.503703932 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 23.324526521 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.70786347227 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395175439497 0.218282227539 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147027766057 0.0743258471296 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818574070015 0.0701772020484 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268838687523 0.128457276422 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288778841572 0.0628817314937 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 14.3799401198 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.197005988 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 98.500998004 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.1389221557 147% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional aronautics magazine surmises that resources ought to be invested in unmann...
^^
Line 3, column 699, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'flight'?
Suggestion: flight
...in to the outer space in a manned space flights. This is all because, people have their...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1389, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... investement for experiments destroying a large number of valuable space flights, expenses relate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1500, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a perfect way" with adverb for "perfect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ng the technology itself and using them in a perfect way for real may not even bring the desired...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: state
...letter is quite vague since it does not states the nature of the success -- the unmann...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
...letter is quite vague since it does not states the nature of the success -- the unmann...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 660, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ething which has been already achieved. The unmanned space probes may not be suffic...
^^^
Line 7, column 688, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
...and enhance the current manned flights; afterall, the success rate of manned flights hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'riskier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: riskier
...usion, the manned space flight could be more riskier and costly to observe at a glance, but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 43.0 19.6327345309 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 11.1786427146 277% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 102.0 55.5748502994 184% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3950.0 2260.96107784 175% => OK
No of words: 792.0 441.139720559 180% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98737373737 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.30495000532 4.56307096286 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58957755475 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 316.0 204.123752495 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.39898989899 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1226.7 705.55239521 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 36.0 22.8473053892 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.0257903227 57.8364921388 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.545454545 119.503703932 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 23.324526521 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.70786347227 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395175439497 0.218282227539 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147027766057 0.0743258471296 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818574070015 0.0701772020484 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268838687523 0.128457276422 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288778841572 0.0628817314937 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 14.3799401198 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.197005988 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 98.500998004 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.1389221557 147% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.