Omega University is thinking about terminate the student evaluation of professors which might be impacting in the vision employers have about students graduated at Omega University. This decision should be carefully analyzed for some reasons.
Firstly, graduates from Omega University will not be more attractive for employers just because the university is not using the teaching effectiveness evaluation. Employers might perceive there is a lot of people looking for a job that got a degree at this university when the evaluation was happening. In this sense, the perception about these former students would not be changed from one day to another just because university decided not to use the evaluation system anymore.
Secondly, employers might have a mistaken perspective about Omega University initiative. While at the first glance the increase in grades might raise skepticism among employers, they might be wrong about the reasons why students had a boost in their grades at the University. It might be the case that Omega University was really able to improve teaching quality of professors which resulted in a real improvement in the way students learn subjects. In this sense, instead of terminate the evaluation system it would be more interesting to demonstrate to employers that this evaluation process really had good results.
Finally, the reasons why employers might be biased to hire people graduated at Alpha University might be others than the Omega’s teaching evaluation. Employers might have got their degrees at Alpha University and have preferences for people that studied there. In this sense, the existence of such process of teaching evaluation would be an excuse to refuse to hire people that got a degree at Omega. In this situation, to terminate the evaluation would not solve the problem.
In conclusion, one can say that the decision to terminate the teaching evaluation process should be carefully reviewed. In order to reinforce this decision, it should be considered things such as: the velocity of change in the visions of employers about the university; mistaken perspective employers might have about the teaching evaluation and improvements made by Omega University; finally, how biased toward Alpha University employers from the region might be.
Essay evaluation report
--------------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 358 350
No. of Characters: 1897 1500
No. of Different Words: 148 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.35 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.299 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.789 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 143 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 90 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 66 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.867 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.118 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.427 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.618 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.114 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...uation would not solve the problem. In conclusion, one can say that the decisi...
^^
Line 9, column 121, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n process should be carefully reviewed. In order to reinforce this decision, it sh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, look, really, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2260.96107784 86% => OK
No of words: 358.0 441.139720559 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43854748603 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88487990535 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421787709497 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2472308093 57.8364921388 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.8 119.503703932 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.70786347227 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186734390462 0.218282227539 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856225572548 0.0743258471296 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502525909924 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136154546316 0.128457276422 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294537451399 0.0628817314937 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.3799401198 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.3550499002 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.5979740519 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 98.500998004 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.