Do you agree or disagree that grade school students should bring a cell phone to school?
Use details and examples to support your explanation.
The popularity of technology devices among youth has become a major source of discussion. One of these discussions is related to the use of cell phones in environments such as grade schools. There is people who support the use of this device in the schools while other persons doesn't see this habit as a good one to young students. I personally believe that grade school students should not bring cell phone to school since it might become a source of distraction and might not help them in improve social abilities.
Some may say that modernity requires students to be allowed to bring mobile phones to school. It might be stated that such device is useful to pupils since it has a variety of apps that might help them to boost their knowledge and to develop good demeanors toward study activities. At the same time, one may also state that cell phones assist in improving communication among school community since teachers, students and parents might always be in touch about what is happening in the school environment.
While these perspectives might have fair points, they ignore some important negative elements that mobile phone might have in the development of youth while in school. Even considering that smartphones are useful, the plethora of activities that might be explored in such devices might transform cell phones in a source of distraction instead of become a source of knowledge. For instance, smartphones with advanced technology offer a lot of interesting educational apps, however it also offers a lot of games and other apps that might be used while in school. Since youth students in general doesn't have maturity yet to deal with these technologies, they might used it in school only to have some fun and not learn new subjects.
Moreover, it is fair to say to cell phones are useful in order to help communicate people. However, students are losing their capacity to keep a face to face conversation since they are spend a lot of time trying to communicate only trough cell phones. This habit might result in damages to these students. For example, they might be not able to express themselves in public, since they are not practicing their capacities to speak and to develop speech. At the same time, they might become very isolated, hence they might be not able to make friends outside the virtual world.
In conclusion, it is possible to say that grade school students does not have maturity enough to use cell phones in their educational environment. It is a must that they use this technology only after be capable enough to deal with the positive and negative aspects of such device.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...vice in the schools while other persons doesnt see this habit as a good one to young s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'saith', 'says'.
Suggestion: saith; says
... improve social abilities. Some may say that modernity requires students to be ...
^^^
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...school. Since youth students in general doesnt have maturity yet to deal with these te...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...ace to face conversation since they are spend a lot of time trying to communicate onl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89461883408 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61339293615 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428251121076 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7365746466 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.277777778 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234992743051 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940383412771 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086319134576 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16544017369 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763318519686 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.