In the preceding argument, the author claims that Adam reality is better than Fitch realty, the conclusion is based on the following premises. Firstly, the author states that Adam has 40 estate agents in contrast that Fitch has 25 ones. Secondly, he states that Adam sales is $168 compered to Fitch's $144. Thirdly, he claims that Adan revenue twice higher than Fitch. So, the best choice for dealing is Adam realty because it has good cost and fastest work. Hence, in the first glance could be plausible. However, careful scrutiny sheds light on plethora of assumptions that could be undermine the value of the argument.
To begin with, the author states that Adam realty better than Fitch realty by stating that Adam has 40 estate agents, but he fails to mention that by presences this number its normal to be the superior over any realty. Second piece of evidence that could undermine the significance is the revenue because we do not have enough information and details about their income and out put further, if the revenue is twice with 40 agents so is it plausible to get compered with the Fitch's 25 agents. In deed, we do not have equal numbers of agents to measure the success. Thus, building a decision depends on weak assumption is not reliable and to bolster the argument the author has to use significant information.
Secondly, the author readily assume that the sales averaged for Adam is better than Fitch, but the truth is a miscalculation for these numbers have would also completely mitigate the assumption because $166.000 for Adam compering with $144.000 within larger number of agents is not convincing. So, the average difference very close or perhaps the Fitch has better sales. Thus, the assumption lack a depth of details that would help to evaluate the value of the argument.
Thirdly, The argument claims without warrant that what hold bad 10 years ago will hold the same case today. Even, if the service was lengthy and costly but the situation completely different and perhaps their service nowadays better than Adam service. Further, he fails by using a vague word like "good price" what is the precise price? So, in order to flourish the assumption he has to use specific and significant numbers, moreover he has to do a complete search about the both companies to assure which one is better.
In conclusion, the argument fails to provide one of the key factor. Namely, all the previous assumptions are equivocal. So, without complete information the argument is unsubstantiated and opened to debate.
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- not exactly. maybe they charge more service fees.
argument 3 -- OK
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 428 350
No. of Characters: 2050 1500
No. of Different Words: 198 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.548 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.79 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.456 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 155 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.381 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.508 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.81 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.518 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.14 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adily assume that the sales averaged for Adam is better than Fitch, but the truth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2122.0 2260.96107784 94% => OK
No of words: 428.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95794392523 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55437418869 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 204.123752495 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495327102804 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3552197204 57.8364921388 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.047619048 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09523809524 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2144985241 0.218282227539 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630947571821 0.0743258471296 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875244126632 0.0701772020484 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115341831668 0.128457276422 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946307922611 0.0628817314937 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 98.500998004 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 12.3882235529 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.