In the preceding argument, the author states that they have to restrict water flow throughout all the 20 floors and that will increase profits, the conclusion of the argument is based on the following premises. Firstly, he states that the first five floors they modified the shower-head to restrict water flows to one-third. Secondly, he claims that there are few complaints about low presure. However, in the first glance could be plausible. Hence, careful scrutiny sheds light on plethora of questions that could undermine the value of the argument.
To begin with, even there is a positive and concrete relation between restricts water usage and higher profits, this does not necessarily indicate conspicuous relation between the two events. In other words, how he concluded the causation? How the strong relation is? perhaps doing this step will force people to move out and find better place. Further, how much are the profits? Perhaps the modification will lead to spend more money. Consequently, the author fails to states a strong causation that led to weaken the argument plus he has to think and answers all the previous questions to boost his case.
Secondly, the largest leap in the argument that the author states the mitigation is done to one-third without actual reading for the current consumption. Thus, the vital question here, from where he knew that this percent will be effective to reduce the consumption and increase profits. Further, is the one -third will decrease the total water usage? Perhaps, without actual awareness they will continue using water as usual and for longer time. Further, how much they used to use? Are all families using the same amount of water? Hence, is it reliable to mitigate the consumption for one-third without plausible information? In sum, a miscalculation would undermine the argument and he has to assess the situation precisely to save water correctly and without bothering the residents.
Thirdly, the fallacy of the argument also lies in using undefined words such as "few complaints" what was the author mean of this word? What is the precise number from the first five floors? Perhaps 4 out of 5 floors are complain. Thus, is it a few number?. Hence, the assumption lack a depth of details that would help to evaluate the significant of the argument.
All in all, the argument fails to mention one key factor. Namely, all the previous assumptions equivocal. Hence, without answers for all the questions the argument is unsubstantiated and opened to debate.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 27 15
No. of Words: 414 350
No. of Characters: 2045 1500
No. of Different Words: 201 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.511 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.94 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.559 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 113 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 80 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.097 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.593 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.266 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.467 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.103 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
... causation? How the strong relation is? perhaps doing this step will force people to mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'state'.
Suggestion: state
...oney. Consequently, the author fails to states a strong causation that led to weaken t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'complained'.
Suggestion: complained
...e floors? Perhaps 4 out of 5 floors are complain. Thus, is it a few number?. Hence, the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...of 5 floors are complain. Thus, is it a few number?. Hence, the assumption lack a depth of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, as to, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 16.3942115768 159% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 2260.96107784 94% => OK
No of words: 414.0 441.139720559 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14009661836 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70253912208 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 204.123752495 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512077294686 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 705.55239521 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 19.7664670659 142% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7082178761 57.8364921388 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0 119.503703932 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7857142857 23.324526521 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17857142857 5.70786347227 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12599172627 0.218282227539 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359904342427 0.0743258471296 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506350366437 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788704249112 0.128457276422 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463061186604 0.0628817314937 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.3799401198 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.3550499002 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.197005988 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 98.500998004 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.