In the preceding argument, the author cliams that the Rialto Movie Theater has to make some changes or will close his doors forever, the conclusion of the argument is based on the following premises. Firstly, the author states that the Rialto has to follow the Apex theater to revitalize Rialto. Secondly, he states a survey indicates that the movies are very costly that prevent people from going to it. Further, in order to prosper Rialto they have to follow Apex features.
To begin with the author assumes that the same location for the both theaters are the same, but is could differ on myriad of things. Such as, perhaps the Apax theater has different topography that encourage people to go or perhaps Rialto theater is located in overcrowded location that mitigate people to go. Thus the source of difference could be the cause of success. Hence, the author fails to provide any justification and the assumption without basis and in order to boost his case he has to provide more information about the two location and what is the successful factors that leads prosper Apax theater.
Secondly, even there is a positive and concrete relation between the Apex features such as good sound system, video arcade and carpeting and seats. This, does not necessarily indicate a conspicuous relation between the two events. In other words, the author fails to mention from where he concluded the causation? Or how the strong relation is, perhaps there are the same features in Rialto theater, or perhaps there is another factor cause the success of Apax theater. Thus, building decisions depends on weak causation is not plausible.
Thirdly, the argument readily states a survey that 85% of people reported that due to increase the movies prices they cannot going to it. In deed, there are multifarious factors that remains elusive and intractable. Such as, is the sample size enough? Or is it representative enough to draw a broad conclusion? What kind of demographic data is presented for instance age, gender, and the economic status for all people These factors play a major role to extrapolate the results. In other words he fail to mention the controlling variables to conclude a valuable assumption.
In conclusion, the argument fails to provide one key factor. Namely, all the assumptions are equivocal. Consequently, without complete information the argument is unsubstantiated and opened to debate.
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- not OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 396 350
No. of Characters: 1961 1500
No. of Different Words: 193 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.461 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.952 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.625 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.244 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.682 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.264 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.493 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.069 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to follow the Apex theater to revitalize Rialto. Secondly, he states a survey ind...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...for the both theaters are the same, but is could differ on myriad of things. Such ...
^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ed location that mitigate people to go. Thus the source of difference could be the c...
^^^^
Line 7, column 499, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'fails'.
Suggestion: fails
...rapolate the results. In other words he fail to mention the controlling variables to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 16.3942115768 134% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 396.0 441.139720559 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10858585859 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69827811299 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520202020202 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 705.55239521 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.0807119722 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9545454545 119.503703932 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86363636364 5.70786347227 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194936914631 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493089027728 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703733589091 0.0701772020484 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102110547006 0.128457276422 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994809477962 0.0628817314937 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 98.500998004 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.