The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Bec

Essay topics:

The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:

"The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin."

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

In the argument, the author states that illegal immigrants must be sent to their native country in order to defend one country's economic and national identity. In order to support the conclusion, The author mentions that the independence of a country depends mostly on the strength of its borders and immigrants are the only reason that cast threat to a country's national and economic issue. However, to evaluate this argument properly, three assumptions must be warranted.

First of all, the author mentions that strength of borders is the only base to retain the independence of a country. Even if we think this assumption as true, is there no chance that other factors might cast doubt on the autonomy of a country? For instance, in 1947 Indian subcontinent were divided into India and Pakistan on the basis of religion. Religion plays the most important role to separate Pakistan from Indian subcontinent. In this instance, border strength couldn't determine the independence of a country. Not only border strength but also other factors are very significant in the matter of independence. if other factors are not taken into account, the assumption will not hold water.

Secondly, the author asserts that the economic and national identity are at stake due to the lack of banning on immigrants entry in a country. While it can be a factor of economic and national identity crisis, it is not the only reason behind it. A country's economy might be hampered due a devastating natural calamity. For example, Bangladesh has banned the entry of Myanmar and Indian people illegally from the borders near Chittagong and Dauki. In 2007, the law was strictly maintained but still the economic condition of Bangladesh was the worst in that year. That is because a massive hurricane named 'Sidor' attacked the coastal areas of Bangladesh. This example shows that stopping the entry of illegal immigrants isn't the only way to improve a country's economic conditions. If these other factors are not mentioned in the argument, it will lose its validity.

Lastly, the author mentions only about the downside of having immigrants. Sometimes, having some extra man power isn't always a cursed thing for a country. The illegal immigrants might be skilled at a certain job that can be beneficial for the country. For example, Germany always welcomes immigrants from other European countries because they know, with this man power, they can perform a great deal of work in the field of technology and automobile which is the current strong side of Germany. Given that, it can be safely stated that having illegal immigrants isn't always necessarily bad.

Some people may argue that Immigrants are the prime factors of the deterioration in economic and national identity of a country. While this claim is not entirely invalid based on the fact that there are actually previous records of bad effects of having immigrants. However, if the above mentioned facts are not stated clearly in the argument, the conclusion of the argument can never be properly evaluated.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...nent. In this instance, border strength couldnt determine the independence of a country...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 619, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...nificant in the matter of independence. if other factors are not taken into accoun...
^^
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'immigrants'' or 'immigrant's'?
Suggestion: immigrants'; immigrant's
... at stake due to the lack of banning on immigrants entry in a country. While it can be a f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 720, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...topping the entry of illegal immigrants isnt the only way to improve a countrys econ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 114, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... Sometimes, having some extra man power isnt always a cursed thing for a country. Th...
^^^^
Line 13, column 563, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...y stated that having illegal immigrants isnt always necessarily bad. Some peopl...
^^^^
Line 17, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mic and national identity of a country. While this claim is not entirely invalid base...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.6327345309 127% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 28.8173652695 111% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 55.5748502994 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2563.0 2260.96107784 113% => OK
No of words: 501.0 441.139720559 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11576846307 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70398605608 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 204.123752495 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459081836327 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 806.4 705.55239521 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 19.7664670659 132% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0677285693 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5769230769 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2692307692 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96153846154 5.70786347227 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237149687197 0.218282227539 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065913568818 0.0743258471296 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584682151906 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141493830369 0.128457276422 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740902578861 0.0628817314937 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 98.500998004 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 505 350
No. of Characters: 2492 1500
No. of Different Words: 225 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.74 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.935 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.637 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 191 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 151 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 101 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.574 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.49 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.068 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5