The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville:
"Over the past three years, there has been a marked increase in cases of 'sidewalk rage,' similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road, but instead among sidewalk walkers. The result is an increase in assaults, property damage, and disruptions of normal pedestrian traffic. In order to address this growing problem, the council must ban cell phone use on sidewalks. Not only do people texting or using their phones slow down pedestrian traffic, but they are also more likely to walk into the road or bump into other walkers. Children are especially vulnerable because they are too short to be easily seen. Middletown passed such a ban and not only have they heard no complaints, but the reported incidents of sidewalk crime has gone down significantly."
I completely disagree with the given arguments as it does not clearly specify what could be the major reason for such accidents or rages among pedestrians or drivers.
The given argument specifies multiple reasons for side walkers rage or disruptions of pedestrian traffic but does not explicitly mentions about the count of assaults, property damages or accidents. It might be possible that not all the causes are associated to pedestrians, vehicle drivers may also have some contributions to it. Either ways, council cannot be dependent only on a petition which does not provide any clear idea of what exactly is the cause or effect.
Moreover city of Centerville might be having more population of pedestrian traffic as compared to Middletown. Maybe people would be peripatetic in Centerville as compared to Middletown. Even the size of road walks must have been widened after Middletown passed the ban regarding the traffic or rages. This sums up to that if Middletown passes a ban doesn't mean that the same effects might be observed with respect to rages or traffic in Centerville.
Although above argument might also be an indication for people to avoid using cellphones while travelling by vehicle or when walking, which might be one of the reason for traffic or accidents. Instead of ban on such activities, citizens must be educated about the effects of such practices and how they could improve the current situation.
Since Middletown applied a ban on such activities, the argument does not approximately specify the percentage decline in traffic or accidents. Maybe even before the ban was applied, Middletown had less number of accidents or had lower traffic as compared to current situations in Centerville. Also sidewalks can be made much more efficient and faster moving if they are more widened as compared to the one's present now.
The given arguments just displays assumed causes and effects instead of actual situations being depicted. Council must evaluate all the conditions present in Centerville and must barely take Middletown into consideration while pasting any kind of ban on such activities. As far as argument is concerned, I completely disagree with the petition and a more clearer view is required to strengthen it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'walkers'' or 'walker's'?
Suggestion: walkers'; walker's
...ent specifies multiple reasons for side walkers rage or disruptions of pedestrian traff...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mention'
Suggestion: mention
...estrian traffic but does not explicitly mentions about the count of assaults, property d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...at exactly is the cause or effect. Moreover city of Centerville might be having mor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 350, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s up to that if Middletown passes a ban doesnt mean that the same effects might be obs...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 294, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...d to current situations in Centerville. Also sidewalks can be made much more efficie...
^^^^
Line 21, column 351, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'clearer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: clearer
...letely disagree with the petition and a more clearer view is required to strengthen it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, while, kind of, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 364.0 441.139720559 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24450549451 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85329807877 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 204.123752495 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513736263736 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5659507254 57.8364921388 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.3125 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.70786347227 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0695840016144 0.218282227539 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264373848342 0.0743258471296 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0160947505226 0.0701772020484 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0403435423966 0.128457276422 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016141634627 0.0628817314937 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 98.500998004 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.