The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College, a private institution, to the college's governing committee.
"We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more students to apply to Grove. But 80 percent of the students responding to a survey conducted by the student government wanted the school to remain all female, and over half of the alumnae who answered a separate survey also opposed coeducation. Keeping the college all female will improve morale among students and convince alumnae to keep supporting the college financially."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Here, the president of the college cites that the college should not allow male students due to establish faith of alumnae and their student. He also claims that students' faith in college increase with not allowing male student to their college. I refute this claim, because of mainly three reasons. I want to ask president three basic question that is it acceptable to take opinion of only female students? What is about other alumnae who isn't in favour of this decision ? How they completely ignore faculty's opinion?
Initially, I want to ask the president of college that isn't this decision some kind of bias towards female students? Because they have only taken opinion of female students. They didn't even ask to male students about their opinion. So, we can say that female students always want their monopoly in the college so they have never agreed on the change proposed by authority. They also might not want any kind of competition from male students. Because of competition with male students, female students' enrollment declines due to limited seats of certain course. So, for more transparent opinion, they have considered opinion of both type of students.
Secondly, I want to ask how he can assert that alumnae who are in favour of change support their college? The author cites that more than half alumnae against this change, but he has not given any numerical value to support this claim. Because if it's round about 49 percent, then it was not proper to condone their views to change in administration process. This might lead them to distrust in their relation with college. Hence, the president has given the numerical values which state number of alumnae who are in favour of change.
At last, I want to ask author about how president can completely ignore majority of teachers who are in favour of change? The author cites that there are more that half faculty are in support of changing admission rules, but in conclusion he has completely condoned faculties views on this assertion. He just considers female students' opinion and more than half alumnae which make this assertion biased towards female student. This is also responsible for the decision of the faculty to rethink their position in this college where their opinion are not even considered.
In conclusion, I just want to say that author has given proper result which includes opinion of all related members who are going to affect by this change. He also give numerical data and give information about how he relate this to main conclusion?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... and their student. He also claims that students faith in college increase with not allo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...udents? What is about other alumnae who isnt in favour of this decision ? How they c...
^^^^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...nt to ask the president of college that isnt this decision some kind of bias towards...
^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e kind of bias towards female students? Because they have only taken opinion of female ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... taken opinion of female students. They didnt even ask to male students about their o...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 493, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... competition with male students, female students enrollment declines due to limited seat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...his assertion. He just considers female students opinion and more than half alumnae whic...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 134, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...of all related members who are going to affect by this change. He also give numerical dat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 165, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
...going to affect by this change. He also give numerical data and give information abo...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'as to', 'in conclusion', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247844827586 0.25644967241 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.157327586207 0.15541462614 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0711206896552 0.0836205057962 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0603448275862 0.0520304965353 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0711206896552 0.0272364105082 261% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.14224137931 0.125424944231 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0258620689655 0.0416121511921 62% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.44308433067 2.79052419416 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0366379310345 0.026700313972 137% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0646551724138 0.113004496875 57% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0129310344828 0.0255425247493 51% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0344827586207 0.0127820249294 270% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2540.0 2731.13054187 93% => OK
No of words: 427.0 446.07635468 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94847775176 6.12365571057 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.57801047555 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36299765808 0.378187486979 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.271662763466 0.287650121315 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.173302107728 0.208842608468 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0913348946136 0.135150697306 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44308433067 2.79052419416 88% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 207.018472906 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426229508197 0.469332199767 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.9797572778 52.1807786196 88% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.039408867 120% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7916666667 23.2022227129 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3030530628 57.7814097925 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 141.986410481 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7916666667 23.2022227129 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.458333333333 0.724660767414 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 3.58251231527 251% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 44.9579430133 51.9672348444 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.44029850746 1.8405768891 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272202933932 0.441005458295 62% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124811932447 0.135418324435 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0936035844729 0.0829849096947 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.500574750626 0.58762219726 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12393940256 0.147661913831 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106587479708 0.193483328276 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816961694984 0.0970749176394 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.411121510291 0.42659136922 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.118209689262 0.0774707102158 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189534162692 0.312017818177 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624630000521 0.0698173142475 89% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.33743842365 132% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.87684729064 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 6.46551724138 155% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.