The author of this argument claims that palean baskets were not uniquely in palea for the reasons that palean baskets also found in Lithos as well as there was no palean boats have been found. Although this argument seems plausible, a close scrutiny reveals its logical untenability.
At the first place, the absence of boats in the palea vestige does not mean palean did not have boats previously. perhaps the boats, which are usually made by woods, have been rotten after being placed for a long time. Or perhaps the boats were transported to another place. The researchers need more evidence A recent study indicates that children living in the himalayan mountain region in nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the united states, despite the fact that people in the himalayan mountain region in nepal receive little to no professional dental care, while people in suburban areas in the united states see a dentist an average of 1.25 times per year. Thus, regular dental care is not helpful in preventing tooth decay.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...though this argument seems plausible, a close scrutiny reveals its logical untenability. At...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
...n palean did not have boats previously. perhaps the boats, which are usually made by wo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.9520958084 8% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 11.1786427146 9% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 28.8173652695 24% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 55.5748502994 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 2260.96107784 39% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 180.0 441.139720559 41% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92777777778 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.56307096286 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30867259173 2.78398813304 83% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 204.123752495 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627777777778 0.468620217663 134% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 705.55239521 39% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 123.046365908 57.8364921388 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 23.324526521 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.70786347227 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 5.15768463074 39% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0264123459917 0.218282227539 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00673743044226 0.0743258471296 9% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.016503266761 0.0701772020484 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0164097079421 0.128457276422 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164097079421 0.0628817314937 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 98.500998004 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...though this argument seems plausible, a close scrutiny reveals its logical untenability. At...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
...n palean did not have boats previously. perhaps the boats, which are usually made by wo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.9520958084 8% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 11.1786427146 9% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 28.8173652695 24% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 55.5748502994 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 2260.96107784 39% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 180.0 441.139720559 41% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92777777778 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.56307096286 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30867259173 2.78398813304 83% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 204.123752495 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627777777778 0.468620217663 134% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 705.55239521 39% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.96107784431 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 123.046365908 57.8364921388 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 23.324526521 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.70786347227 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 5.15768463074 39% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0264123459917 0.218282227539 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00673743044226 0.0743258471296 9% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.016503266761 0.0701772020484 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0164097079421 0.128457276422 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164097079421 0.0628817314937 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 98.500998004 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.