Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
In order to refute intaking of inoculations, there should be ebough evidence from the doctors that it could be fatal. Even if there is small probablity that intaking inoculations could result in death not even taking a chance and letting it go would anyway result in death. Inoculacations could help in developing antibodies and fight the flu. I strongly condemn the fact that permits should not be given to routinely administer.
A report could be demanded from the medical authorities that the inoculations do not contain any toxic substance, whether if it safe to consume by people of all ages,
the do's and dont's ,remedies if the inoculations effect the other way round.
If the report states that it is safet to consume by people of all ages (maybe by certain percentage), refraining the inoculations could prove to be harmful and only lead to more spread of disease. If the reports also suggest that incase of certain allergies or other issues it could give side effect , it should have specifications for the remedies that work 100%.
In order to conclude, on having specific evidence inoculations should be given accordingly at no situation should there be restrictions in administering it routinely irrespective if the area is more or less infected.
Comments
e-rater score report
No. of Words: 209 350
Minimum 250 words wanted
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 8 15
No. of Words: 209 350
No. of Characters: 1029 1500
No. of Different Words: 117 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.802 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.923 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.889 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 74 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 50 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.167 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.423 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.63 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.084 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t safe to consume by people of all ages, the dos and donts ,remedies if the inocu...
^^^
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... people of all ages, the dos and donts ,remedies if the inoculations effect the ...
^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: INCASE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in case of'?
Suggestion: in case of
...sease. If the reports also suggest that incase of certain allergies or other issues it co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r other issues it could give side effect , it should have specifications for the r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, anyway, if, may, so, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 55.5748502994 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 2260.96107784 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 209.0 441.139720559 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04784688995 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.56307096286 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95261519808 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 204.123752495 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564593301435 0.468620217663 120% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 705.55239521 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 19.7664670659 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.138708061 57.8364921388 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.875 119.503703932 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 23.324526521 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.70786347227 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193681234764 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837201466316 0.0743258471296 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463470935795 0.0701772020484 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106453234659 0.128457276422 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315524364304 0.0628817314937 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.3799401198 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.3550499002 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.