There are some complaints and negative feed backs received from audiences about the coverage of mid-night news which do not include weather and local news properly. Lossing viewers lead to less advertising contracts which may harm channel revenue dramatically.
Argument at first glance looks logical but in has some underlied mistakes . first of all increasing coverage of weather and local news although is a mean to satisfy a group of complaints, it effects should be assessed for other groups and viewers which may not be intrested in weather and local news and prefer to obtain more national news. Media should behave in a regresssion line of wide and divergent tastes among people. Focusing on one special group and covering their preferences may bring disputes for other groups and finally miss part of audiences. Thus new decision on coverage of local and wather news absulotly requre more statistical feedback from a wider sample of audiences.
On the other side recent event that is corporations which are reluctant to either make or update their advertising contracts should not be considered related directly to abovementined problem. Loosing channel viewers defenetly impact both scale and number of advertising contracts but putting all blame for weaknes in weather news coverage may not seem true. Other beneficial and absorbing programs can and should be vigurous enough to cover some defects in newsroom. Its highly recommanded to include in above assessment some factors from usability of other channel programs during a period. If a decreesing trend is shown in visibility of other programs, so avoiding new advertising contracts would be convinced by this reason.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 16 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 267 350
No. of Characters: 1400 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.042 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.243 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.681 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 111 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.273 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.963 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.379 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.379 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.054 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...gical but in has some underlied mistakes . first of all increasing coverage of wea...
^^
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...al but in has some underlied mistakes . first of all increasing coverage of weather a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 560, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ups and finally miss part of audiences. Thus new decision on coverage of local and w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eem true. Other beneficial and absorbing programs can and should be vigurous enou...
^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ough to cover some defects in newsroom. Its highly recommanded to include in above ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, look, may, so, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 11.1786427146 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 28.8173652695 21% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 2260.96107784 63% => OK
No of words: 267.0 441.139720559 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31835205993 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73695492371 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.468620217663 128% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 705.55239521 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0318648463 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.70786347227 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216085286103 0.218282227539 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738652775096 0.0743258471296 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781283426889 0.0701772020484 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159563979773 0.128457276422 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503108417435 0.0628817314937 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.3799401198 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32208582834 116% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.