In the memorandrum, the manager of the the television company concludes that they should restore time devoted to the weather and local news as it was before, to attract more viewers and not lose the remaining advertising revenues. This assertion is due to complains from the viewers concerned with more coverage to nation's news rather than weather and local news. However, the assumptions by the manager does not hold water, and the following three questions needs to be answered to strenghthen the assumption.
Firstly, What are the rasons that the local company have cancelled their contract? In other words, are they related to the not showing local and weather news? It could be the possibility that the local advertisors who have cancelled their contract are facing huge losses in their business and cannot afford to pay the revenues to the television station. Also, there could be a reason that the advertisors feel that they should spend more money during daytime shows, which could attract more viewers rather than late night. If any of the statements are true, the assumption by the author does not hold place.
Secondly, Who were the viewers who complained about the local and weather news? There can be the possibility that the one's who complained are not interested in nation news and just want some entertainment at late night in terms of local news which would bring in the society news. Also, there could be possibility that the people who are complained don't want to learn about the national news as at the end of day and are not interested about it. Perhaps, there could be a possibility that the age group awake at night and the one's who complained are youngsters. Morever, there could be a possibility that, the might have complained regarding it during a bad weather and wanted to know about it. If any of the arguments in the statements are true, the assumption is weakened.
Additionally, Will weather news and local news attract more viewers and advertisors? It could be possibility that with introduction of such news, the company might lose more viewers. It could be a possible reason that people might feel such news boring and not watch it when its already the end of their day and they are already exhausted. Furthermore, there could be a possibility that they might be interested in such news time- being. They would not like to hear about it in the whole program. If any of such arguments hold place, the vitality of the statement is hampared.
In conclusion, as the statement stands, is flawed. In order to strengthen the statement, the author needs to answer these three questions and provide evidence in terms of research and reevaluate the conclusion provided. Hence, if the author answers these with appropriate research, then the vitality is proved
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
In the memorandrum, the manager of the the television company concludes that they ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
In the memorandrum, the manager of the the television company concludes that they ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lity that the people who are complained dont want to learn about the national news a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 13.6137724551 154% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 2260.96107784 103% => OK
No of words: 471.0 441.139720559 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94267515924 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63598349684 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.40127388535 0.468620217663 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7548553154 57.8364921388 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.217391304 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4782608696 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253721934277 0.218282227539 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842330051776 0.0743258471296 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929311972032 0.0701772020484 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149756624242 0.128457276422 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913567689422 0.0628817314937 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.32208582834 87% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
In the memorandrum, the manager of the the television company concludes that they ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
In the memorandrum, the manager of the the television company concludes that they ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...lity that the people who are complained dont want to learn about the national news a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 13.6137724551 154% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 2260.96107784 103% => OK
No of words: 471.0 441.139720559 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94267515924 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63598349684 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.40127388535 0.468620217663 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7548553154 57.8364921388 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.217391304 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4782608696 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34782608696 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253721934277 0.218282227539 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842330051776 0.0743258471296 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929311972032 0.0701772020484 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149756624242 0.128457276422 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913567689422 0.0628817314937 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.32208582834 87% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.