Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with the station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, several local businesses that used to run advertisements during our late-night news program have just cancelled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand the coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs.
Given memorandum argues about rescheduling the late-night news programs as it was in its former level. The news program has dedicated increased time to national news and decreased time to weather and local news. Most of the complaints were concerned with station's coverage of weather and local news. And the local businesses has cancelled their advertising contracts. The given premise is valid but incomplete and the assumption is unwarranted. Therefore the conclusion is doubtful.
They have increased the time to national news, then there must be some reason behind it. People do not randomly take decisions when its related to their business. The reason for changing the program schedule over the past year is not discussed in the given argument. The memorandum has mentioned nothing about the demand of national news. Will other group of viewers complain about the station's coverage of national news , if the time devoted to weather and local news is restored to its former level? No research has been done on this topic.
Local businessess have just canceled their advertising. But what about the national businesses? Do they have any contract for the late night national news program? The argument has not clarified if they have any other advertising revenues who may be cancelling the contract if the time devoted to nation news will be reduced.
Thus the given assertion may be correct but the information provided through this argument is deficent. Thus the assumption is unwarranted and the conclusion is doubtful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lete and the assumption is unwarranted. Therefore the conclusion is doubtful. They h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'stations'' or 'station's'?
Suggestion: stations'; station's
...her group of viewers complain about the stations coverage of national news , if the time...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t the stations coverage of national news , if the time devoted to weather and loca...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...d to nation news will be reduced. Thus the given assertion may be correct but ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ided through this argument is deficent. Thus the assumption is unwarranted and the c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 55.5748502994 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 2260.96107784 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 246.0 441.139720559 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26016260163 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71313668211 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 204.123752495 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 705.55239521 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.8473053892 57% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9000778237 57.8364921388 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.8888888889 119.503703932 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 23.324526521 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.70786347227 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391697651404 0.218282227539 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117595924551 0.0743258471296 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13716758938 0.0701772020484 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229272921568 0.128457276422 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157549981899 0.0628817314937 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.3799401198 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.197005988 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 12.3882235529 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.1389221557 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.