All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The given issue is highly deabatable because different have their own perspectives. I concur with the given recommendation to a agreat extend. It is said that small act brings big impact and so, a company should be wary while taking decesion. It is important to listen to the people inside the company but sometimes consulting the consultants can even give better idea.
A company consists of different employees. No other people know about the inside enviroment and internal affairs of the company other than its own employees. Even the employees have many ideas about the problems they are facing so that the company can reach to the approriate solutions very soon. So a company should listen to the witful staffs in order to operate more efficiently.
For example, in the IT companies like Google and Facebook, they often organise meetings to discuss about the ways to execute the office more efficiently. This will also make the bond between the management team and the workers stronger. However, sometimes companies should be able to take some arduous decision for the better solving of the problems. In such case its own employees may not have proper knowledge about the problem. Thus it is better to hire consultant to suggest ways for the company. For example, a IT company has to confront problems regarding the law and regulationof the nation but the employees of the company are mostly from technical background. In this case the employees may not have better idea to handle the situation. SO instead of taking risky decision, the company can hire a consultant for the appropriate idea.
Thus, more often company should llisten to the employees of its own but sometimes hiring consultant may be better way. Sometimes spending some amount of money can save the company from upcoming disaster. So, it depends on the situation whether to listen to its own employees or hire an outside consultant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...concur with the given recommendation to a agreat extend. It is said that small ac...
^
Line 9, column 17, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...more efficiently. For example, in the IT companies like Google and Facebook, the...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 432, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ave proper knowledge about the problem. Thus it is better to hire consultant to sugg...
^^^^
Line 9, column 515, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: a; IT
...gest ways for the company. For example, a IT company has to confront problems regard...
^^^^
Line 9, column 520, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...ways for the company. For example, a IT company has to confront problems regarding the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to confront problems regarding the law and regulationof the nation but the empl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 318.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03773584906 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6740582263 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503144654088 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1587837711 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.3157894737 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7368421053 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422050496494 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13431743291 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932225304497 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268925312521 0.150359130593 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463454901914 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.