A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The given issue is highly debatable because different people may have disparate opinions on the given topic. Some go for the given recommendation while others can not embrace it at all. Personally, I am consonant with the given topic to a great extent because all the people should have similiar knowledege at the basic level.
National cirriculum should be designed according to the geographical location, political situation, moral values, historical importance of the nation. A student should have the basic knowledge of all these background. Different people may have different areas of interest but it does not mean that someone who is highly interested in the history of the country should not have knowledge of geographical location.
For example, in china everyone compulsorily follows same national cirriculum in their national language in order to provide the citizen same basic knowledge. When all the students study same national curriculem until they enter the college, it would be easier for the colleges to design the specific course. Because one who will be designing the course of college will be able to estimate the level of all the students. He will be known about the level of knowledge the students have. Similiarly, it would be easier to judge the skills and knowledge of the students who studied similiar curriculum.
However, some people argue that if a child is very dedicated in some fields like computer programming, then he should be given opportunity to explore that field. In my point of view national cirriculum should not be exactly same. Instead it can vary a little from place to place. If someone is interested in programming then he can be able to take extra class for it. So, basically the major courses will still remain the same.
Thus, a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, and they should be give opportunity to select some extra course as elective subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on. For example, in china everyone compulsorily follows same national cirri...
^^
Line 9, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...colleges to design the specific course. Because one who will be designing the course of...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
... cirriculum should not be exactly same. Instead it can vary a little from place to plac...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12307692308 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69997852282 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510769230769 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8235294118 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9411764706 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410822557605 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134416955908 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174483361314 0.0758088955206 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269136814358 0.150359130593 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.231141097303 0.0667264976115 346% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.