Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.
In the above argument, it is being concluded that our ancestor already knew about paleo diet that consuming bone broth can have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases and emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illness. To support the argument, it is cited that eating bone soup can heal our joints and chondroitin. But also many skeptics diagree with the evidence provided. The argument as a whole is based on many unstated assumptions which significantly undermines the argument.
Firstly, it assumes that a study has been conducted and proven true about bone soup and has an evidence that bone broth it can heal joints and chondroitin. But is the study being verified by other scientists? Because in the argument itself it is shown that the skeptics disagreed with the hypothesis. It can be possible that the study was completely false and skeptics were correct about the bone broth.One cannot believe in any study which has never being verified. The author in the argument assume the above study to be true. If the above assumption is proven false then it would undermine the argument.
Secondly, it assumes that ancient human had already studied about the physiology and had came to the above conclusion that bone soups were used as medicines. It is assumed that they consumed such diet just for the sake of their health. But what if it was just a coincidence? Is there any evidence provided that ancient people where using such diet just because to use it as a medicine? It can be possible that they unknowingly used such diet just for the sake of mitigating their hunger. It could also be possible that people loved the taste of such diet that it was spread throughout the society that everyone started consuming such diets. There is no proper evidence that the diet used by them was for the purpose of curing chronic illnesses. This requires further analysis in order to support the argument, else it simply undermines the argument.
In conclusion, the argument, where is stands right now is inconclusive because of many assumptions the argument is currently based on. Further more explanation and research is required to consider the argument's significance as true. But due to many misleading assumptions, one cannot conclude that following the diet can cure chronic diseases and ancient people used such diet for curing from the illnesses.
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 58
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 60
- The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve This sanctuary is essential to the survival of the 300 bird species that live in our area Although only a small percentage of the land wi 68
- Some people believe that competition drives young athletes to perform at their best while others believe that competition discourages those who are not athletically talented from participating in organized sports 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...udy being verified by other scientists? Because in the argument itself it is shown that...
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
...ptics were correct about the bone broth.One cannot believe in any study which has n...
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ment assume the above study to be true. If the above assumption is proven false th...
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Use past participle here: 'come'.
...dy studied about the physiology and had came to the above conclusion that bone soups...
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...nd research is required to consider the arguments significance as true. But due to many m...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, as for, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 13.6137724551 154% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 28.8173652695 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 2260.96107784 87% => OK
No of words: 397.0 441.139720559 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98236775819 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62236586323 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443324937028 0.468620217663 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8224804042 57.8364921388 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1904761905 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9047619048 23.324526521 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80952380952 5.70786347227 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140742058392 0.218282227539 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435900627256 0.0743258471296 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505699080216 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916809309343 0.128457276422 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384672022979 0.0628817314937 61% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.3799401198 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 398 350
No. of Characters: 1936 1500
No. of Different Words: 177 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.467 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.864 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.519 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.952 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.718 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.326 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.489 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5