Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It is true that Teachers plays a crucial role in enhancing students' overall perfromance. Einstein in an educational conference once said 'Best practices of a mentor decides the performance of a student.', he added that if teacher is able to guide the student well, then the students can do well in their academics. The author in the prompts suggests that salaries of the teachers should be based on their students' performance. It is true to agree with the author because if teachers are doing their jobs with such a profilerate passion then they must be paid well. But it is not considerable to decide their salaries based on their students' performance as there are many other factors which play crucial roles too. In my opinion, i mostly disagree with the author as deciding salaries only by students academic performance and not considering other factors is foolhardy.
Deciding salaries by students' perfromance is definitely not considerable because if students are not able to perform well even though the teacher taught them with their complete passion, then punishing teacher by paying them low is not considerable. Consider the example of programming and coding lectures, for some students they find it difficult to learn programming, it is completely possible for them that they will not do well in that subject even though the teacher provides good knowledge to them. It is completely true to believe that not all students do well in all the fields of education so due to some students that dont do well in a particular field doesn't mean that teacher is not qualified enough to teach them and deciding their salary on the basis of students' performance will be foolhardy. Also consider the example of a Music teacher, in some schools music lectures are not considered as a part of academics, but that doesn't mean that music teacher should be payed accordingly as her lectures are not considered as a part of academics. Some students purposely don't do well in music as they know it wont affect thier academics, but the teachers are doing their job sincerely. In such case teachers are at the loss just because students purposely didn't do well.
However, it is reasonable to some extend to believe that if teachers are good enough to teach students well such that the students are performing well in their academics, then they must be paid high as it motivates other teachers to perform their job more passionately and this in turn will help students to do well in their academics. It will motivate teachers to try enhancing their teaching skills which at the end will be benificial for students itself.
In conclusion, in my opinion deciding teachers salaries according to students' performance is not a good suggestion as for some teachers it may be biased decision just because even after their good teacher skills students didn't perform well and at the end teachers had to pay the cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 357, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to program', 'to programme'.
Suggestion: to program; to programme
...tudents they find it difficult to learn programming, it is completely possible for them tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 628, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... education so due to some students that dont do well in a particular field doesnt me...
^^^^
Line 2, column 663, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...that dont do well in a particular field doesnt mean that teacher is not qualified enou...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 813, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'considers'.
Suggestion: considers
...nts performance will be foolhardy. Also consider the example of a Music teacher, in some...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 862, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...the example of a Music teacher, in some schools music lectures are not considered as a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 937, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...idered as a part of academics, but that doesnt mean that music teacher should be payed...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1079, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t of academics. Some students purposely dont do well in music as they know it wont a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1264, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...he loss just because students purposely didnt do well. However, it is reasonable to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...ell. However, it is reasonable to some extend to believe that if teachers are good en...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...fter their good teacher skills students didnt perform well and at the end teachers ha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, may, so, then, well, as for, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2407.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 490.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91224489796 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72408007314 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.387755102041 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6755643567 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.466666667 118.986275619 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252185784607 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124308787357 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614186989449 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195556655313 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573550550475 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.