"The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of it's border; if the number of illegal immigrations of the country cannot be checked, both it's economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrations pose such threats, every effort must be made to return them to their country of origin."
r even popular at the task at hand are high.The prompt suggests that real talent of a popular musician cannot be accurately assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.In my opnion this is true to some extent but also false in some cases for the following reasons.
Consider medieval ages during which the kings rule was absolute.Suppose the kings son that is the succesor to the throne in the near were to become a muscian.Granted the royal status of the prince it wouldnt be difficult for him to become a popular musician .Since the prince is of royal blood not matter how good or bad his singing capabiltiesare, his crowd will undoubtley always praise him because of his royal status.Thus in the case not long after the prince has past away an honest assesment of the muscian could be possible because of his fame.
On the contrary one could argue if the musician is truly talented then it is just a matter of time and oppurtinity that the musician becomes famous .In this case the critics would grant an honest assessment at any given time of their music no matter how famous .Consider robin sparkles currently a heavy metal singer who had rosen to fame because of her pop singing but following her drastic shift to heavy metal music she lost a lot of fan following .Once who was impentrable even by crtics is now mocked by critics for her current heavy metal singing beca
Thus we can sum that the prpmt that real talent of a popular musician cannot be accurately assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment is situational ,in some cases it might be true and false in some other cases,it would be hard to come up with a genaralized opnion for the given prompt
Comments
e-rater score report
Out of topic.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 5 15
No. of Words: 334 350
No. of Characters: 1496 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.275 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.479 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.325 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 95 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 66.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 30.023 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.55 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.55 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.283 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the above article published in the ne...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rall significance of the conclusion. The author of the above newspaper assume...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... explicitly looses its significance. Another assumption the author makes is t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cannot be considered significantly. In conclusion, the argument, which it st...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'weakened'.
Suggestion: weakened
...to support the argument. The author has weaken the argument by assuming many assumptio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 55.5748502994 85% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 329.0 441.139720559 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08814589666 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88383060672 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 204.123752495 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431610942249 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1748753669 57.8364921388 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.324526521 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.70786347227 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422920970706 0.218282227539 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132567798582 0.0743258471296 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834555100363 0.0701772020484 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236964125552 0.128457276422 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940548874146 0.0628817314937 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.3550499002 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 98.500998004 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.