A recent study rating 100 college football players showed a strong relationship between their average number of colds caught per year and their teams’ records. Of the players studied, those who had the fewest colds had teams with win/loss ratios that we

Essay topics:

A recent study rating 100 college football players showed a strong relationship between their average number of colds caught per year and their teams’ records. Of the players studied, those who had the fewest colds had teams with win/loss ratios that were, on average, 50% higher than teams with players that caught more colds. These results suggest that if a college football team wants to win, it should recruit players that catch a lower number of colds per year than their peers.

 In this statements its describe a rating of the football game in who is how many time win or how many time loss. A recent study rating 100 college football players showed a strong relationship between their average number of colds caught per year and their teams’ records.

In this statement his describe to the relationship between the numbers of colds caught per year and their teams record. The second one is describe the who had the fewest colds teams with win or loss ratios that were, on average , 50% higher than teams with players that caught more colds. This statements is describe to the ratio between to the highest and lowest teams. Then the finally the result suggest that if a college football team wants to win, it should recruit players that catch a lower number of colds per year than their peers.

First of all the recent study of 100 college football players showed a strong relationship between the numbers of colds caught per year and their teams records.in this statement is the showing to the his team bonding. In this statement not given proper information to the football match and his players.

Second one is the describe to the ratio between the highest and lowest teams and who caught the more colds. In this statements the highest soring and lowest scoring performance in the football match scoring average ratios. But this statement is proven the who is the best because the only numbers is not important to the life. Not numbers is desided to the future. Then, the football match is important score is not important.

Then finally the result is suggest that if a college football team wants to win, and then it should be recruit players that catch a lower number of colds per year than their peers. So, in this statement the is desided to the which team is win or loss.

But in all information the score is not all time important for the life sometime the situation and practise is also important to the life. Because “the numbers is just a digits it’s not judge to the people” then some information is not properly given it’s a very confusing information.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
 In this statements its describe a rating of the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'described'.
Suggestion: described
...d their teams record. The second one is describe the who had the fewest colds teams with...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...win or loss ratios that were, on average , 50% higher than teams with players that...
^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ms with players that caught more colds. This statements is describe to the ratio bet...
^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...that caught more colds. This statements is describe to the ratio between to the hi...
^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'described'.
Suggestion: described
...t caught more colds. This statements is describe to the ratio between to the highest and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the finally the'. Did you mean 'finally the'?
Suggestion: finally the
...n to the highest and lowest teams. Then the finally the result suggest that if a college footba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
...rds.in this statement is the showing to the his team bonding. In this statement not giv...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... match and his players. Second one is the describe to the ratio between the highest and lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...teams and who caught the more colds. In this statements the highest soring and lowes...
^^^^
Line 9, column 28, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'suggested'.
Suggestion: suggested
...important. Then finally the result is suggest that if a college football team wants t...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 174, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a digit' or simply 'digits'?
Suggestion: a digit; digits
...life. Because 'the numbers is just a digits it's not judge to the people'...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, then, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 2260.96107784 78% => OK
No of words: 369.0 441.139720559 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77235772358 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42758676505 2.78398813304 87% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 204.123752495 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.341463414634 0.468620217663 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 705.55239521 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3031890627 57.8364921388 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.588235294 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 5.70786347227 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.539168251422 0.218282227539 247% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188526113061 0.0743258471296 254% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196804513336 0.0701772020484 280% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315430956765 0.128457276422 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177086709187 0.0628817314937 282% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.3550499002 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.56 8.32208582834 79% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 98.500998004 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 368 350
No. of Characters: 1687 1500
No. of Different Words: 120 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.38 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.584 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.316 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 117 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.647 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.189 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.588 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.4 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.635 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5