In the memorandum from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants, replacement of butter has little impact on their costumers. Moreover, memorandum states that “either these customer do not distinguish better from margarine or they use the term ‘butter’ to refer to either butter or margarine”. However, there might be several other factors that is responsible for no complaint regarding replacement.
Firstly, there is a possibility that main ingredient of Happy Pancake house is not butter or it might be possible that Happy Pancake house famous for those things that does not require butter or very little butter. Therefore, these factors also need to be examined to evaluate the proposed explanation.
In addition to above, “only 2 percent of customer have complained” memorandum stated. It might be possible that margarine is more preferred choice compared to butter. Perhaps it might be possible that majority of southwestern united states people do not like butter. Therefore, this point also need to be consider for proper examination of the explanation.
Moreover, as per the business manager, a number of customer does not complaint about the replacement of butter with margarine. There are good chances that people are liking the change in content. Further, resident of southwestern United states consider margarine more healthy compared to the butter. Moreover, there is also a possibility that people are bored of butter. So, all these points also need to be considered to reach the conclusion.
In conclusion, to reveal the proposed explanation on no complaint of replacement of butter milk by margarine, all above points need to be evaluate properly to rival the explanation.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 268 350
No. of Characters: 1397 1500
No. of Different Words: 123 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.046 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.213 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.777 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.867 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.191 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.366 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.366 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.065 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this customer' or 'these customers'?
Suggestion: this customer; these customers
...er, memorandum states that 'either these customer do not distinguish better from margarin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ne. There are good chances that people are liking the change in content. Further, residen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: BORED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bored with'?
Suggestion: bored with
...e is also a possibility that people are bored of butter. So, all these points also need ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate properly to rival the explanation.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 268.0 441.139720559 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51492537313 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14836055807 2.78398813304 113% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 204.123752495 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481343283582 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4966915125 57.8364921388 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5333333333 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 23.324526521 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 5.70786347227 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24152933308 0.218282227539 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825538863844 0.0743258471296 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683112102078 0.0701772020484 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14018413351 0.128457276422 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583465148878 0.0628817314937 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.3799401198 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.3550499002 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.5979740519 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.