In today’s world, everyone is somehow connected with the business, politics, education, and government. The prompt said that powerful leader should step down after five years from the field of business, politics, education, and government, and surest path to success for any enterprises is revitalization through new leadership. I totally disagree with the statement that for the success of any enterprises revitalization through new leadership is necessary, based on the following two reasons.
To begin with, the leader in any enterprises gain efficiency and confidence after a few years of work experience. If the leader does not have enough experience, then the possibility of making sound and confident decision is low. Generally, the leader, which have 1-2 year of experience in the field of transport planning- mainly concern about the movement of traffic and road safety of people - make decision on traffic management and on road safety based on their technical skill rather than based on their practical knowledge, while transport planner who have 5-6 year of experience generally blends his technical skill with practical knowledge. Hence, transport planner with more experience in the field of traffic management has more skills to solve the problem effectively. Therefore, if the above-mentioned statement is correct, then the revitalization of enterprises through the new leadership will have a negative impact.
In addition to the above, a leader with less experience might face difficulty in handling or guiding the person with more experience. In this case, senior professional might deny working or create trouble. For example, in the cricket team, a senior player generally creates problem for the new appointed captain. As generally, they don’t listen to captain, deny to field for the full match, wanted to field in a safe location or sometimes choose his batting position on their will. As a result, teams generally face difficulties to win over opposition due to their internal problems. Hence, if the above statement is considered, then the leader with less experience might not lead the enterprises to the path of success.
However, many individuals say that new leadership bring a new idea or revitalize the enterprise. But, experience plays a crucial role in making a sound decision and blending the enterprises in a difficult situation. For these above-mentioned reasons, experienced leadership is more important to enterprises than the new leadership.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...on through new leadership. I am totally disagree with the statement that for success any...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'enterprises'' or 'enterprise's'?
Suggestion: enterprises'; enterprise's
...with the statement that for success any enterprises revitalization through new leadership i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'deny fielding'.
Suggestion: deny fielding
...ss match experience. As generally, they deny to field for full match, wanted to field in safe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d the enterprises to the path of success However, many individuals say that new l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2070.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5795148248 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00919706277 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504043126685 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.9619298119 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.375 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253401612274 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928374390116 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127899545659 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183457230634 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149334349547 0.0667264976115 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.