A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, food-processing companies also add salicylates to foods as preservatives. The twenty-year study found a correlation between the rise in the commercial use of salicylates and a steady decline in the average number of headaches reported by study participants. At the time when the study concluded, food-processing companies had just discovered that salicylates can also be used as flavor additives for foods, and, as a result, many companies plan to do so. Based on these study results, some health experts predict that residents of Mentia will suffer even fewer headaches in the future.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
The study conducted on the residents suffering form headaches who already have Mentia is the prime establishing point for the author. It describes about the effects of salicylates in the food and how food industries have started adding salicylates externally to increase the flavor, preservative and other such purposes. It is in proper brief explanation about what salicylates is responsible for are the effects of it.
To elucidate the author's view point, the mentioned facts are true to most of the part but also they do not let know the feeling of falsehood. The nuances of salicylates is well presented with the reasoning behind it, not only that but the author has also brought it down to where all it is used and how it is used. To further find the stated study it also has the future aspects of the substance which will be held responsible for decreasing the headaches in the future.
Another reason to why the author is not capricious is that he mentions the fixed timeline of the research that is twenty years, indicating that the time is too much for this research and a few possibilities of it are being wrong. Even, the salicyates show promising effects upon the residents affected by Mentia in general and the usage of it does not causes any other harm. Everything is well elaborated, with it being in a chain each one explained right after the following is completed.
The overall paragraph seemingly makes sense about saclicylates, Mentia and the usage of salicylates in the food industries. The future scope of the residents of Mentia is backed by study and health experts who predict that residents of Mentia will suffer fewer headaches thus it resembles that the author is ending it on a proper note and not leaving it mid and keeping the readers in a wonder.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 308 350
No. of Characters: 1451 1500
No. of Different Words: 156 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.189 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.711 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.662 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 96 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.899 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.37 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.615 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 353, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...in general and the usage of it does not causes any other harm. Everything is well elab...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, thus, well, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 308.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82467532468 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70351432613 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519480519481 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.970053254 57.8364921388 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.090909091 119.503703932 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.324526521 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.70786347227 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183747986267 0.218282227539 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658048168977 0.0743258471296 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465718094038 0.0701772020484 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109382823018 0.128457276422 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454165969088 0.0628817314937 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.3799401198 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.3550499002 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 98.500998004 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.