Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The given statement by the author states that some people believe it is required that people living in developed nations lower their energy consumption and live a more sustainable lifestyle due to climate change occurring while other people believe that such changes are not necessary based on evidence for global climate change. This statement portrays an equivocal view to a solution of a problem.
Yes, the people considering about reducing energy consumption and living an ordinary life are valid in terms of what they believe as reducing the energy consumption would lead to lower usage of fuels and conventional sources of energy i.e.; coal, gas, petroleum which will indirectly lead to increase in the life of sustainable fuels. Also, living an ordinary life would affect in following ways like the number of items which are common and required for daily purpose like soaps, detergents, oils, foods and transport vehicles will be supplied as per the demand in the market. Once the product demand gets lower the sales would get lower for various companies having a common product like soap manufactures who later would divert to other manufacturing options and only the prominent would continue.
Even, the decrease in requirement of things would lead to export to other developing countries. Hence individuals living in the remote areas would get access to things which are not produced in the country. Also, it will helpful in increased relationship between the countries which will unite them.
However, the people believing that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change are taking the matter lightly. The current report for climate change might be neutral but it might happen that in the next coming month there would be a sudden increase in the level of caution towards climate change. So, as the saying goes precaution is better than cure it is better to take the required stances before it gets too late.
Thus considering the statements upon two divert opinions, the people who think that people living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle are more correct in there terms. Conserving the environment now will be beneficial for the upcoming years, providing a relief from unwanted heating of the earth due. Everything done now would show its effect in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat such changes are not necessary based on evidence for global climate change. T...
^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Once the product demand gets lower the sales would get lower for various compan...
^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...o export to other developing countries. Hence individuals living in the remote areas ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...evel of caution towards climate change. So, as the saying goes precaution is better th...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e people who think that people living in developed nations to reduce their energy...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19280205656 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56471283604 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516709511568 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.0912317806 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.285714286 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7857142857 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45013430842 0.243740707755 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134897492526 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173676638593 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251696163859 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155410339943 0.0667264976115 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.