Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
The given statement states that due to the increase in content writing on internet there will be vague and similar written articles which will be a prominent factor for the decrease in professional content writing. It is appealing claim provided by the author with a valid reason which clears the doubt for a person not familiar with blogosphere.
The term "blogosphere" is used to describe the latest trend for writing on a topic and posting it online. Any common individual can post online without verification and how educated he/she might be. This increases the chance for repetition, rumors, adding of personal information which is to stand out and also this adds up to a complete different story than what has happened. The is also a way in which certain people try to get famous, through plagiarized material collected from standard sources and mixing it all together and posting under their name.
Moreover, it also leads to loss of actual talent : such as someone who is way more good at covering topics and writing on them will in the end get covered up in all the naive publishers. He might increase his quality of writing but would get into a copy content mess or divert his mind to something else. This does no benefit to the publishing industry also as they require prime content writers but evaluating them can be a hefty task for the companies like a needle in the hay stack.
However, rise in the amount of online publishers also increases the number of opinion on a specific topic. It also establishes publishers who have been working hard before and are trying there best to get recognized out in the world. Also people of different country get to access certain information like places which are generally visited by localities, rich cultural and heritage places and which can improve tourism.
Hence the claim mentioned by the author has its benifits and disadvantages, this trend would decrease as the time prevails as for now the concept of it is new/fresh. Thus only good content writers would continue with posting online.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...est to get recognized out in the world. Also people of different country get to acce...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...places and which can improve tourism. Hence the claim mentioned by the author has i...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...for now the concept of it is new/fresh. Thus only good content writers would continu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92550143266 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74327972935 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573065902579 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.029629976 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.785714286 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120709368791 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434864770653 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295363119245 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654272960868 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176120755027 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.