Claim: The emergence of the online “blogosphere” and social media has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political t

The author has stated that the expansion of blogs and social media usage has enabled people to express their political views online openly. It has lead to a decline in the quality of political discourse in the United States. This view is completely biased against freedom of expression in the online world.

The people of the United States have a fundamental right to express their opinion and choices on any platform, be that in person or online through blogs and social media. Everyone has their own opinions regarding politics and they are free to express it. Preventing them to do so is a violation of the basic human rights granted by the constitution of the USA.

The author claims that political posts online have weakened the quality of political discourse. This is not true as the mainstream media has been in the pockets of political power for a long time. The TV shows and news are tailored to suit the political agenda of the powerful people and they don't let the people know the whole side of the story. Whereas, blogs and social media posts are not affiliated with any political party and show different sides to the same story. The reader gets a choice to form their own opinion and choose their own side.

In the 2008 elections of South Carolina, the mainstream media was focusing on glorifying the charming Mr. Charles Doyle and his various golden promises. The residents adored him and were ready to cast their votes for his favor. But thanks to a group of intellectuals, Mr. Doyle's dark history was uncovered and posted online for the world to see. Mainstream media tried to ignore and suppress the story, but the story caught on and the state was saved from a grave mistake.

The claims made by the author are partially untrue, if not completely, as one is supposed to have better judgment and trust while reading the posts and watching videos online. One should know which source is trustworthy and which is completely biased. But blogs and social media do play an important role in forming an honest opinion about politics in the United States, and they will still continue to do so.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... agenda of the powerful people and they dont let the people know the whole side of t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, still, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75543478261 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39307617165 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5783586978 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282570333966 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095585228924 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947541594651 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158327334717 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778795678303 0.0667264976115 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.