The president and administrative staff of Grove College claims that the century-old tradition of all-female students in the program of the college should not be ended as this will continue mainting the morale among students and will also be kept supported by college alumnae financially. He bases his reasons on the ground that there were survey conducted by the college that shows eighty percent of the students are not in favour of admitting male students into the program. The author's argument is likely to be a failure as there are several flaws in the argument of the author that can be seen by the below reasons.
Firstly, the author readily assumes that the survey conducted by the student is a key role in making the conclusion of keeping only all-female students and neglecting male members in admitting to the college. The author is neglecting the majority of faculty members decision that voted in favor of admitting the male students into the college programs made in the recent faculty meeting. The author is giving more value to the students survey than the experienced faculty members which cannot be accepeted easily. These might be the faculty staff that would have worked in other college where coeducation existed and college was performing better as compared to only all-female students. This shows the narrow-mindness of author's argument and deriving conclusion on incomplete evidence.
Secondly, the author claims that the survey he conducted has responded with eighty percent of the students in favour of all-female eduation who participated in the survey. There might be the case that only few numbere of students has participated in the survey that want only female students as their collagues and of these puny number of students eighty percent of students where in favour of the decision. This is to say that the author fails to clarify the number of students participating in the survey that indicates the data that cannot be easily accepted. Also, the author's conclusion states that by maintaining only all-female education they can convince alumnae to keep supporting college financially which seems to be an arcane reason.
Though there are several issues with the author's argument at present, with research and clarification, he can improve his argument significantly. For example, the author should have taken into consideration the decision of both faculty and students together with concrete reasoning and then come to conclusion. Should have provided the reason why all-female education only can help the college financially etc.
In a sum, as we can see from above mentioned reasons and examples, we can conclude that the aurthor's argument is prone to accute reasoning and hence open to debate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 481, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ing male students into the program. The authors argument is likely to be a failure as t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...isted and college was performing better as compared to only all-female students. T...
^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...at cannot be easily accepted. Also, the authors conclusion states that by maintaining o...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...hough there are several issues with the authors argument at present, with research and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 55.5748502994 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 2260.96107784 102% => OK
No of words: 442.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20814479638 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7443616104 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434389140271 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.0 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9945648963 57.8364921388 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.875 119.503703932 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 23.324526521 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.70786347227 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267114014761 0.218282227539 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101951184806 0.0743258471296 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996111324148 0.0701772020484 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144890809228 0.128457276422 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101849966176 0.0628817314937 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.3799401198 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 98.500998004 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.