In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the river's water and the river's smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up Mason River. Use of the river for water sports is therefore sure to increase. The city government should for that reason devote more money in this year's budget to riverside recreational facilities.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
This statement looks like logical, but there are some wrong sentences in it which is not logical.
First, this statement mentions raking water sports as their favorite recreational activities at the first sentence. However, it seems to have a ralation between the first sentence and the setence which mentions that increase the quality of the river's water and the river's smell. This is a wrong cause and result to solve the problem.
Second, as a reponse to the complaints from residents, the state plan to clean up the river. As a result, the state expects that water sports will increase. When you look at two sentences, the result is not appropriate for the cause.
Third, the last statement is the conclusion. However, even though residents rank water sports, the city government might devote the budget to another issue. This statement is also a wrong cause and result.
In summary, the statement is not logical because there are some errors in it. The supporting setences are not strong enough to support this issue.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in summary', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266666666667 0.25644967241 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.112820512821 0.15541462614 73% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0769230769231 0.0836205057962 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0461538461538 0.0520304965353 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.025641025641 0.0272364105082 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0820512820513 0.125424944231 65% => OK
Participles: 0.00512820512821 0.0416121511921 12% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.48251729175 2.79052419416 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0307692307692 0.026700313972 115% => OK
Particles: 0.00512820512821 0.001811407834 283% => OK
Determiners: 0.164102564103 0.113004496875 145% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0102564102564 0.0255425247493 40% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0205128205128 0.0127820249294 160% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1030.0 2731.13054187 38% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 172.0 446.07635468 39% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98837209302 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 4.57801047555 79% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372093023256 0.378187486979 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255813953488 0.287650121315 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18023255814 0.208842608468 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104651162791 0.135150697306 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48251729175 2.79052419416 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 207.018472906 48% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.469332199767 124% => OK
Word variations: 51.3884530345 52.1807786196 98% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.039408867 60% => OK
Sentence length: 14.3333333333 23.2022227129 62% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4203082787 57.7814097925 56% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8333333333 141.986410481 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3333333333 23.2022227129 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.724660767414 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.58251231527 0% => OK
Readability: 39.9147286822 51.9672348444 77% => OK
Elegance: 1.91666666667 1.8405768891 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351309008622 0.441005458295 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128801994568 0.135418324435 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.065653210439 0.0829849096947 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.650378701338 0.58762219726 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151487619689 0.147661913831 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153791797275 0.193483328276 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724309453528 0.0970749176394 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.290363526873 0.42659136922 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.141018538798 0.0774707102158 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203053731607 0.312017818177 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110303234172 0.0698173142475 158% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 5.36822660099 19% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 3.0 14.657635468 20% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.