The author claims that the Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean because these baskets with distinctive pattern were found in another area where the Palean baskets couldn’t have reached. This statement made by the author is filled with gaps and holes. The author also fails to take into account the various other factors which might have affected his conclusion.
To begin with, the author makes a claim regarding the origin of the Palean baskets. He states that woven baskets characterized by a particular pattern have been previously found only in the vicinity of Palea. The author fails to mention the authenticity of this claim as he does not provide any information regarding the accuracy of this finding. It might have been possible that these exact woven baskets with the pattern could have been found in some other area and the people who found it might not have reported about it. Moreover, the author states that these baskets were found in the village of Palea. Finding an object in a particular place does not necessarily mean that the people of that area created that object. Therefore, this proves the fallibility in the author’s assumption regarding the origin of the Palean baskets.
Besides, the author mentions about finding a “Palean” basket in Lithos by archaeologists. These archaeologists could have made a mistake in recognizing the pattern on the woven baskets and hence, the baskets could have well been different from the Palean baskets. The author fails to mention about the credibility of these archaeologists and how experienced they were in this area of finding basket patterns. They might have been new to this field and made a false discovery of the Palean baskets found in Lithos. Hence, the author again makes an incorrect assumption regarding the credibility of information and does not investigate the information completely.
Additionally, the Brim river is mentioned as deep and broad due to which the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boats. But, the exact depth and width of the river is not mentioned and hence, we cannot make any assumption regarding its depth. Therefore, the Paleans could have reached Lithos by swimming across the river. Moreover, the author fails to mention about the routes that leads to Lithos from Palea. These routes could have been used to travel by road and hence, eliminate the need for boats. The author mentions that no Palean boats were found in Lithos, but, he fails to take into account that boats from other places could have stopped at Palea and then traveled to Lithos.
To sum it all up, we can conclude that the author does not take into account the various other factors pertinent to the Palean baskets. Hence, we can say that his claim about the the Palean baskets not being unique is false. Therefore, these Palean baskets may or may not be unique, but one cannot say for sure about the uniqueness of these baskets.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 491 350
No. of Characters: 2374 1500
No. of Different Words: 178 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.707 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.835 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.398 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 158 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.458 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.979 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.365 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.538 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.135 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ides, the author mentions about finding a 'Palean' basket in Lithos by ...
^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey might have been new to this field and made a false discovery of the Palean bas...
^^
Line 7, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se routes could have been used to travel by road and hence, eliminate the need fo...
^^
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... Hence, we can say that his claim about the the Palean baskets not being unique is fals...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... Hence, we can say that his claim about the the Palean baskets not being unique is fals...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 28.8173652695 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 55.5748502994 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2457.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 490.0 441.139720559 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01428571429 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58044176776 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 204.123752495 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.375510204082 0.468620217663 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 705.55239521 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 14.0 8.76447105788 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6161240128 57.8364921388 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.375 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04166666667 5.70786347227 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.67664670659 299% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311809961636 0.218282227539 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107035561386 0.0743258471296 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125489673927 0.0701772020484 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193094871735 0.128457276422 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903231313228 0.0628817314937 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.32208582834 86% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.