Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Who has not seen politicians fighting each other? Think about it and it is probable that you have seen as politicians of your own country as foreign politicians dealing with personal disputes between them, which could not have reached a good solution or simply ended nowhere. Therefore, politicians should come to an agreement instead looking for personal or party ideals.
Many good bills stay "behind scenes" waiting to be supported by a majority of congressmen in order to be applied. Due to this delay, many benefits for the population are sadly lost. For example, in Peru, many congressmen debated a law related to increase the profits to medical services for the people. A necessary policy for my country. This took several months to every politician gets consensus and this, consequently, led medical doctors to be on strike. This action prejudiced the population the same quantity of time that the bill was delayed to be approved. In addition, this problem is not particular to my country, United of States could face possible economical problems because its politicians do not come to a common ground about the country budget. Thus, political disagreements led bills to be delayed which can harm not only few people but the entire country.
At present political conflicts between countries have born in order to satisfy particular interests which lead to no consensus between parties. These conflicts could end in wars, which could bring a high death toll. For instance, the conflicts in the Middle East have been there a long time for reasons which involve the control of some zones. Many intents of get an agreement between parts have taken part of the history of the conflict for example, between Israel and Palestina, but this only brought more casualties. Similar to this example, many countries have asked the help of The Haya Court in order to resolve conflicts for sea delimitation as for instance, between Peru and Chile. Both parties have had meetings to arrive in a consensus but there was no agreement because of Chilean interests. No one knows the possible response of Chile but its president mentioned that Chile will make to respect its territory with the force independently of the decision of the Court. If politicians between different parties pursue a common ground, it could avoid many people lose their life.
It is true that many laws have been polished before they were approved for a majority of congressmen due to different thoughts between parties. If all the congressmen had come in agreement with the bill as soon as it was proposed, had it been really a good law if this had approved at first instance? If it was polished before, it is probable that the answer was No. Thus, because of politicians do not always think in the same way, this situation has permitted that bills have been enhanced before it was applied beneficiating the population. For example, a bill which regulated recently the private pension fund of workers in Peru. At first instance, the party of the government had made a regulation of this fund which prejudice in certain form the workers. The opposition noticed that and negated to approved this bill unless this be checked before. The result was a stronger law which got rid of excesive costs of the entities in charge and did not threaten the stability of the worker's funds.
In conclusion, if political forces do not arrive in an agreement, many beneficial bills could stay in written words and not to be applied and many army conflicts could be developed, which may lead people to worse situations than they are now.
- Some people believe that success in life comes from taking risks or chances. Others believe that success results from careful planning. In your opinion, what does success come from? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 72
- The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that numbe 65
- A university plans to develop a new research center in your country. Some people want a center for business research. Other people want a center for research in agriculture (farming). Which of these two kinds of research centers do you recommend for your 90
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 73
- A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 74
Sentence: Who has not seen politicians fighting each other?
Suggestion: Who has not seen politicians fighting to each other?
Sentence: Many intents of get an agreement between parts have taken part of the history of the conflict for example, between Israel and Palestina, but this only brought more casualties.
Description: The token of is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to of and get
Sentence: The result was a stronger law which got rid of excesive costs of the entities in charge and did not threaten the stability of the worker's funds.
Error: excesive Suggestion: excessive
No. of Words: 604 350
Don't always talk about one side. Read this link for new GRE issue essay pattern:
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 27 15
No. of Words: 604 350
No. of Characters: 2921 1500
No. of Different Words: 278 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.957 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.836 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.574 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 208 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 171 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 106 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 66 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.37 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.146 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.63 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.269 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.458 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.065 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5