As the famous saying goes "As dirty as politics". Most of us hates politics as we view it not as a career or a profession which enlightens the society, but rather which darkens the society as whole.The statement asserts the path of dilemma in which politicians must pursue. It can either be the path of the elusive and unrealistic ideals or it could be the path of a more pragmatic and a reasonable one. According to my point of view, I suggest a politician should always pursue the path which is more feasible, less perilous and more beneficial to the society for the following reasons.
To Begin, Politicians are always on the lookout to entice the eyes of public and they would go to the acme of deceptive claims. On doing so they not only risk their respect and dignity at stake but also the beliefs, safety and security of the common people. A fiasco of such claim would render the politician fallible and mendacious, thus it would be a hard time for him to trump the next poll. For example let us consider the claim made by a presidential candidate in a certain country. The claim goes like "A Wall must
be built in order to thwart the illegal immigrants coming into his country". Although people may agree in a metaphorical manner that a virtual wall should be constructed to stop the illegal immigrants, no one would agree that a real wall being built. Since the construction of a real wall would unnecessarily waste the money resource and the time, it would make real sense if the incumbent have laid stringent laws and actions which exhibits the same ideal. Thus the politician have gone too far in achieving his idealistic which resulted in nothing but profligate of hard earned money coming as a tax to the state. He is risking the belief which people had on him and the securities of lives of his own citizen who are facing challenges in jobs as the taxes have skyrocketed.
Additionally, The politician should pursue the goals which are often necessary for the state or the nation at present, rather than a utopian ideal. In pursuing the pragmatic goal he ensures the nation is strong enough to attain the now seem unrealistic goal in the upcoming years. Let us consider the space programs undertaken by The Government of India for instance. Is it okay for a country to ignore the people who lacks even the basic necessity of a life such as food and shelter and to focus more on space programs which is of no use to the masses of the poor and lacking society. Any wise man would not concord with tons and tons of money being funded onto the space program whereas it is, at the same time lacks the very basic necessity of both people and the surrounding.
Some may argue by saying that the politician should focus on the more elusive goal so that he may attain a higher counts in the poll. But is it worth it? Is it worth to sacrifice the lives of people by whom he has become valedictory?. People are the strength of a nation. They must be taken care of, by politician adhering a pragmatic and
necessary ideal rather than deceived by a politician pursuing idealistic goals which render nothing more than a shining count of poll result which lasts temporarily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ther which darkens the society as whole.The statement asserts the path of dilemma i...
^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a metaphorical manner" with adverb for "metaphorical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ountry'. Although people may agree in a metaphorical manner that a virtual wall should be construct...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... actions which exhibits the same ideal. Thus the politician have gone too far in ach...
^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...people and the surrounding. Some may argue by saying that the politician should fo...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., by politician adhering a pragmatic and necessary ideal rather than deceived by ...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f poll result which lasts temporarily.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2641.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 570.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63333333333 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6180876393 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 832.5 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7866367837 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.826086957 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7826086957 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4347826087 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189435659284 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506343665704 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551414516328 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105934721663 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552259383887 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.