Goals, by definition is what that moves us or inspires us significantly. Some would argue that if a goal is worth, people can go to any extreme expedient manner to achieve it. whereas, other would say that if a goal that is harmless, benign can only be or should be pursued to any means. On weighing the evidence between the outline of perseverance of goals. It is certain that, it is the benign, philanthropic goal that can be persevered to any level and not the detrimental goal
that causes ruin and harm.
To begin, Let us consider Nuclear revolution that occurred during the 1960's for instance. Our society were obsessed with the significant energy resource this atomic process could bring to our insatiable world. Thereby, resulting in proliferation of in-numerous counts of atomic power stations being constructed. Although this kind of power extraction had significant advantages, It was not weighed to the harm it exudes to its ambient society in case of unfortunate situation may arise. The goal of achieving an efficient power source could be understandable, but this does not justify nor do it provide license for the probability of harm it may render. Thus this kind of achieving goals by any means, in our
case it is the destruction of life does not seems to be pertinent.
Moreover, If a goal is kind, philanthropic it can be persevered to any heights to fructify it. For example, Consider the dream of eradication of polio. This disease has ravaged the human life since pre-historic days. But with the technology of vaccine, researchers and doctors dared the dream of demolishing it by the turn of 20th century. Such dreams which has beneficial effects to the society can be followed at any cost, since it provides more good than harm.
Some might argue that pursuing a worthy goal to any means might point to the hindrance and impediments that westerners faced when they occupied the indigenous America continent. According to this view, doesn't he backing the cause and ruin that can be imposed on the tribes of America in order to scale the westerner dreams?. Surely this would have been averted by any humane person. On hearing and listening the kind of perilous odyssey the Native-American have undergone, One would
not want a goal to be pursued to any heights if it does not posses morally ethical reasoning behind it.
To conclude, A goal should be coveted to any means only if its beneficial to the person's or the entity's surrounding. The examples of Nuclear revolution and Conquering of American continent all convey the same. A goal that a person thrives not only should benefit him but also his surroundings and thus it will have
a circular benevolence to himself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 597, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...le, but this does not justify nor do it provide license for the probability of harm it ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 656, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... the probability of harm it may render. Thus this kind of achieving goals by any mea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seem'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: seem
... it is the destruction of life does not seems to be pertinent. Moreover, If a goal...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
... it is the destruction of life does not seems to be pertinent. Moreover, If a goal...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rica continent. According to this view, doesnt he backing the cause and ruin that can ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'backs'.
Suggestion: backs
...nent. According to this view, doesnt he backing the cause and ruin that can be imposed ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91703056769 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83829358096 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517467248908 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6709051868 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9130434783 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9130434783 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.97078651685 181% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102570847525 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030767482624 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249730144658 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0401533470818 0.150359130593 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294978231286 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.