1. The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author asserts that the certain benchmark of a great nation is the public welfare of denizens of that nation instead of the rulers, artists, or scientist’s feat. This is the assertation with which I do not concur. Among the countless rearing reasons, I will list the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs to support my standpoint.
The first striking fact which should be considered is the preparation of welfare and citizens’ satisfaction are rudimentary duties of each governor. No matter what is the policy of a nation, the main and fundament role of the governor is providing sufficient sources to fulfill the people basic needs. For instance, the free and high-level health care, the high-standard educational system, and the plenty of occupancy capacities are basic needs of each citizen and governor with no doubt and exception is responsible for. Consequently, the coverage of the basic needs of the governor should not be listed as the indicator of the greatness of society. This fact also gets more logical by the consideration of the candidates of government’s attempt for getting the majority of votes during the election. Since the election is done by the citizens, and people of the nation make the decision over the responsible person, in this case, all troths of governments are seeking to appeal the people to get more vote.
Another crux point which should be considered is the chasm willing of the human-being for thriving. Indeed, it is obviously explicated that mankind never gives up the seeking of flourishing and thriving, all these growths are actually beyond the basic requirements which are mentioned as the welfare of people in the writer’s claim. An individual according to his talent, knowledge, and desire can go steps further and explore the novel realms. In addition, these explorations are feasible in a case which the fundament requirements of mankind are responded. Therefore, the achievements of the citizens in the various fields lucidly represents the people’s satisfaction and their high-status of lifestyle. For instance, the United States is listed among the top ten great countries in the annual ranking, the main reasons for this position are the rich adherence that people gain from their governors and has this opportunity to delve into the various areas with success.
Finally, the adduced sentence has separated the successful people’s feats from the other ordinary people; besides, considered them as the minority and underestimate their successes. However, it is not a fair perspective toward the issue. The undeniable fact which should be highlighted is those successful people are also from the identical nation and possess similar conditions as the public. Therefore, it would not be a wise action to separate their achievement from other people. On the other hand, as they could bust on that environment, it shows that space owns the platform for waxing the people talent.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned facts entirely illustrate that the achieved success by the artists, ruler, and scientist are mere representor of the society’s greatness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sentor of the society's greatness.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, consequently, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2660.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30938123752 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05930534042 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526946107784 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 813.6 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9192307689 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52380952381 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138325659207 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440480685344 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377100783146 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822844493138 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347550345882 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.