Learning has been the backbone of humanity. It is through learning and adapting we have evolved from a primitive nomadic state to a highly intellectual civilization. However, the means to achieve knowledge were never benefited from consensus. Challenge is an integral factor in development of any idea or knowledge.
People with contradicting views are very necessary for learning. If that wasn’t true, we would still consider that the Earth is flat not round. Humans can develop insights anywhere and anytime, get inspired of even most mundane things. But no two individual think the same way. So since there are variations in thinking, contradictory insights are bound to happen. These may lead to dissention or annexure of some more refined details to the proposed theory. Both of which are highly integral to increase human learning.
Moreover contradicting views throw a new light to any idea, exposing it to higher level of scrutiny. The scrutiny will reveal the loopholes and shortcomings of the conjecture. Thus, motivating people to overcome the shortcomings or render the idea impossible. Either way, we learned something that we didn’t know before. Plus, we were able to disregard any illogical knowledge on our way as well.
But nothing is perfect in this world. Contradiction was not always very constructive towards knowledge and learning. People can be very pertinacious. Their reluctance to anything new is also a contradiction, but at times this disagreement even costed many philosophers their life. Galileo was executed because he considered Earth to revolve around Sun, which was totally in opposition to the common understanding of the time, that Sun revolves around the Earth. Similarly many people after succumbing to the stress, as a result of mass disregard for their insights, suffered. Hence, a constructive dissention is necessary, else it is just tyranny against knowledge.
Humans learn everyday, but it is through the power of different views, dissentions we learn the most and the best. There are certain chances that a single individual may suffer, but at the end the entire humanity will benefit from the gained knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...integral to increase human learning. Moreover contradicting views throw a new light t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 463, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...me, that Sun revolves around the Earth. Similarly many people after succumbing to the str...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 14, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...anny against knowledge. Humans learn everyday, but it is through the power of differe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, still, thus, well, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35860058309 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9970136462 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609329446064 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3276101753 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.52 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.72 23.4991977007 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.92 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198973071901 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468909515321 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407257508309 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100561349767 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208088672562 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.