In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
The argument that because of intensive media coverage, it is impossible for a society to regard and living man or woman as a hero is unsound in that the speaker misinterpret the effect of media and the meaning of hero.
Admittedly, since the development of media which is motivated by profit, it is harder for everyone to maintain a perfect image. Media makes profit through the watching, and reading of audiences and readers. Most medias try their best to trace scandals of the celebrated which are the favorite pastime of most people. Thus, maintaining perfect image is almost unlikely for anyone.
However, the implication of the relation between perfect and hero is unwarranted. It is not necessary for a hero to be unimpeachable. For example, we all know the sexual scandal of Martin Luther. Yet we still lionize him as a hero in the respect of human rights.
Furthermore, media is conductive to spread the story of hero even though it spread scandal, too. Thanks to the advance of media, information is transported faster and faster. Everyone has the chance to become renowned. On the prerequisite of that a hero is unnecessary to be unassailable and everyone's stories can spread faster in advent of media, it is more easily for a person to be regarded as a hero.
To sum up, in the age of media coverage it is more possible for a society to consider a living man or woman as hero because a hero doesn't mean to be unimpeachable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 132, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ing man or woman as hero because a hero doesnt mean to be unimpeachable.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, still, thus, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 251.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77290836653 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85687096644 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 215.323595506 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517928286853 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4561929793 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5714285714 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366149157701 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112190770101 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128475528835 0.0758088955206 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233319572212 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147811052291 0.0667264976115 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.