An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
I strongly disagree with the statement given. Knowing how a doctor treats the patient is dependent on the patient's actual condition as well. Even if multiple patients suffer from the same ailment, it is possilble that because of age, gender and several other factors, a different treatment was given to patient. This could potentially create confusion and mistrust between the patient and doctor. This relationship needs to be preserved, especially if the case is serious. If the dorctor is inexperienced / relatively new in the field, there is high probability that people would not consider taking advice or being operated by him/her, even though (s)he is great at it.
Also, doctors are taught to follow a certain sequence, and not to be biased by opinions. Although experience plays an important role in this, there are always multiple ways to judge a doctor's competency. In village areas, where there is a dearth of even the right equipment, getting a doctor's opinion would be more important; let alone getting medical records of similar patients. In the urban areas, people generally tend to trust online reviews and brand-names. Again, the question to consider here is: how anonymous the data is? Would people be willing to provide their data for future use?
Patient's privacy is of paramount importance to both the hospital and the patient's family. The data is clearly the fuel of the future, and how that data is used by the other patient is unknown. For such a system to exist, it needs to be fail-proof which is clearly challenging to implement. Multiple governments have tried to link the medical records with the patient's identity, but the privacy breach generally makes it difficult for them to opt such measures. So, past reviews, standard operating procedures for an ailment should be a good pointers to know how good a doctor is. Knowing what the results were previously, does not give the exact or whole picture that patient is looking for.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...ere are always multiple ways to judge a doctors competency. In village areas, where the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
... of even the right equipment, getting a doctors opinion would be more important; let al...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...importance to both the hospital and the patients family. The data is clearly the fuel of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'implementing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: implementing
...fail-proof which is clearly challenging to implement. Multiple governments have tried to lin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...ed to link the medical records with the patients identity, but the privacy breach genera...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'pointer'?
Suggestion: pointer
...cedures for an ailment should be a good pointers to know how good a doctor is. Knowing w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01840490798 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65719849306 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598159509202 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7401204397 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.61111111111 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249573131942 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074832990032 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799836218191 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164419849955 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558825162616 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.