The author suggests that the ailing patient should have an access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly affected patients. I disagree with author's point of view as maybe the disease is same in both patients but how their body responds to particular treatment can be different.
We always do research and analysis about the doctor before consulting the doctor. But, the patient should not be given other patient's records. Nowadays, we have many mobile applications such as Practo where one can find a suitable doctor for himself and read the reviews and rating. Use of such applications should be promoted if patients want to know about the competency of the doctor.
Providing easy access to other patient's records is a violation of their privacy. There may be a case when his medical records can be misused by someone.If the patient wants to be sure about the treatment he is undergoing then he can show his reports to another doctor for validation purpose. The patient's can although interact with each other to share their experiences.Let us consider a scenario where two patients are suffering from Cancer. Although the disease is same, but the stages of their disease can be different. One might be at initial stage and other can be at final stage. It is the doctor who will decide the perfect treatment for both as the treatment will be different.
Human body reacts in different ways to a certain treatment varying from person to person.Let us a patient has gone through records of another person with same disease and finds out something worse than his. This will lead to anxiety in the patient and he will be skeptical about the ability of his doctor. Both physical and mental fitness are needed for a person to be free of any disease. The patient can be misguided through this records which he cannot even observe properly in medical terms.
To conclude, I would suggest not to share the doctor's records of treating other patients. We should believe in our doctor based on his qualification and how our body is responding to his treatment initially.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...sts that the ailing patient should have an access to his or her doctors record of treatin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...dical records can be misused by someone.If the patient wants to be sure about the ...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Let
...h each other to share their experiences.Let us consider a scenario where two patien...
^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Let
...treatment varying from person to person.Let us a patient has gone through records o...
^^^
Line 7, column 428, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e. The patient can be misguided through this records which he cannot even observe pr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, similarly, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87042253521 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57898977437 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501408450704 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7588702804 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0555555556 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311744883871 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119292045882 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124045369736 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204943787388 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788206540298 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.