I agrre with the author that the best way for a society to prepare it's young people for leadership in government , industry , or any other field is through a sense of cooperation and not competition.
Consider an example of education system. As the level of competition has increased, the parents push their children to study more by giving them examples of students who are more intelligent than them. This can have a negative imapct on the children as their conscience will not tell them whether to consider it as competition or motivation. If the parents will tell their children to always have a healthy competition with others then they will always approach the other student for help and will maintain a cordial relationship with everyone.
A sense of cooperation and team spirit is always appreciated irrepective of a field whether it's job or education.In corporate sector, we always find people who are more intelligent and smart than us.When we work as team, always remember individuals don't win but teams do.Let us say competition with your colleagues will give you promotion but you can never be a good leader if you do not maintain a friendly relationship with everyone and help and understand other people's problems.
A healthy competition is always good as it brings postive changes into the society. In today's democratic world, although different parties criticize the ruling government but they do not consider it as a bad competition. The opposition points out some problems of the society which are resolved by the government. This shows how they cooperate with each other.
A good leader will always ask others about their opinions and consider their perpective as well. A perspective leader will always appreciate his team rather than taking all the credit. So, we should always teach our children to be cooperative to flourish as good leaders in their domains.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government , industry ...
^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ung people for leadership in government , industry , or any other field is throug...
^^
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... for leadership in government , industry , or any other field is through a sense o...
^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ways approach the other student for help and will maintain a cordial relationship...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...of a field whether its job or education.In corporate sector, we always find people...
^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
... are more intelligent and smart than us.When we work as team, always remember indivi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rk as team, always remember individuals dont win but teams do.Let us say competition...
^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Let
...ember individuals dont win but teams do.Let us say competition with your colleagues...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08360128617 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83744924375 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543408360129 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 109.29250693 60.3974514979 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.615384615 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.76923076923 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169528198946 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594972400645 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093862997132 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122526432946 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121436070532 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.