A treatment seeked at the hospital for a healing patient should primarily be the responsibility of the individual. This is because, there are ample technological resources available nowadays to observe the reviews about most of the doctors in renowned hospitals around the city. Skeptically, granting access to the doctor's records is similar to invading in to the private space shared between the doctor and the patient. Therefore, there are chances for leakage of information regarding the healed patients leading to breach of hospital's privacy policies.
Despite the fact that the doctor's record must be private, there are possibility for the hospital to maintain their website providing testimonials about their doctors. It may include the educational background and the experience gathered by the medical practitioner. Furthermore, the ailing patient must be advised to find the accuracy the doctor possesed by simple feedbacks or reviews provided by other patients. However, it is the responsibility of the medical institution to maintain records about their best doctors with appropriate details easily made available on the public forum. For instance, a famous hospital in the city can maintain their website showcasing the best abilities of their doctors along with the specialties they pioneer. A cardiologist with a rating of highest number of starts can be analyzed as the best and easily be seeked by the patient through appointment calendars.
Similarly, there are situations where the treatment requires immense confidence from the patient to undergo therapies or surgeries. In this case, a very promising medical practitioner is definitely a dream of every recovering patient. Hospital can produce abstract reports about the statistics of successful treatments available in their history to ensure the patients with will power and motivation such that, they are convinced about the operations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 776, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...y pioneer. A cardiologist with a rating of highest number of starts can be analyzed as the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, may, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 290.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58965517241 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99357417242 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548275862069 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5648984581 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.692307692 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24038702748 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911901484704 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633408210837 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163089094954 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379071070635 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.38706741573 122% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.