All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The topic presented which states All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. I would not completely agree to this statement because there are pros and cons of both the scenarios and it depends from company to company taking many factors into account.
Firstly, the empolyees who are recruited are done so for a specific reason. Such as engineers they are expected to work on the technical side and even though they are experienced they might have alot on their plate to support the company in other ways as well. Secondly, consultancies are experts in devising a plan or a strategy to tackle certain problems which may help you save alot of time or prevent you from taking bad decisions. Apart from that if the company has just started it is best recommended that they seek for expert help on how to progress and work more efficiently. Talking about fresh companies there are sitautions which the company faces where they do not have the infrastructure to support certain projects. Hence they seek help from consultants on which type of employees should be hired and in many cases those consultants provide us with temporary employees termed as externals.
Although, seeking help from consultancies seems really fruitful but there are downsides to them aswell. First of all the main reason companies are stymied to hire consultants is the cost which is associated with them.Hence the companies who do not have such kind of a budget for the project they should listen to the thoughts of the employees which already have experience. Another very crucial reason is the company data confidentiality, involving alot of externals in your project could jeopardize the companies secrets.
In conslusion to sum it all up .If companies have the budget but lack the infrastructure they should seek help from experts consultancies. On the other hand if the company lacks the budget, but has time on their side and can take a few risks can go on trusting thier employees
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny taking many factors into account. Firstly, the empolyees who are recruited...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...astructure to support certain projects. Hence they seek help from consultants on whic...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orary employees termed as externals. Although, seeking help from consultancie...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
... the cost which is associated with them.Hence the companies who do not have such kind...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... the cost which is associated with them.Hence the companies who do not have such kind...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...ence the companies who do not have such kind of a budget for the project they should list...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld jeopardize the companies secrets. In conslusion to sum it all up .If compa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
.... In conslusion to sum it all up .If companies have the budget but lack th...
^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
... In conslusion to sum it all up .If companies have the budget but lack the ...
^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...risks can go on trusting thier employees
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, kind of, such as, talking about, first of all, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98823529412 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76056636283 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523529411765 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7802473631 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.461538462 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6153846154 5.21951772744 242% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39638266326 0.243740707755 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147633234769 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124032730743 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266977885819 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11062628766 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.