All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Companies always have an aim to keep flourishing and out-perform their competitors, so as to maintain their place in the cut throat business race. For this purpose, they are constantly in need of inflow of new ideas to increase their efficiency. Many of them resort to seeking advice from outside consultants from this instead of turning to their own employees for this purpose. Like every coin that has two sides, this practice has its pros and cons. But I mostly disagree with this tendancy of the companies for two main reasons.
To begin, employees are the heart and brain of every company. No outsider will know about the details like the firm like they do. They have lived through and stuck around with the company through the good and bad times. Hence they are the best people to consult regarding the improvements that need to be made in order to improve the efficiency. For example if a paper company wants to multiply its sales, the best people to consult about this would be the employees from the Sales and the accounting department who have the maximum knowledge regarding the sale trend and the causes of the low sales as also they maybe having some valuable insights about how to improve the sale record by either lowering the prices or providing their clients with some offers. Hence they will prove more beneficial to the company development than any outside consultant.
Secondly, consulting employees for topics pertaing to improved efficiency of the company will make them feel heard and respected. This will improve their sincerity, probity as also their work efficiency. If some third party is consulted for this purpose, it will not only cost the company in terms of money that these consultants demand but also in terms of the efficacy of the employees who may feel insulted by this. for instance, when an employee gives a suggestion about increasing company profits and it is implemented, he will feel worthy and it will increase his sincerity and integrity towards the company.
While some may agree outside consultnats may have more experience in this field their intergrity and authenticity is always questionable.
Thus due to it increasing the efficiency of the employees themselves and of the company, the companies should consult and hearkin to their own employees rather than outside consultants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hing and out-perform their competitors, so as to maintain their place in the cut throat ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...company through the good and bad times. Hence they are the best people to consult reg...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 762, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...oviding their clients with some offers. Hence they will prove more beneficial to the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...mployees who may feel insulted by this. for instance, when an employee gives a sugg...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...authenticity is always questionable. Thus due to it increasing the efficiency of ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0205655527 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61685041737 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506426735219 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.8671759995 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.882352941 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8823529412 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302829710159 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103786573624 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066936293109 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182493914574 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606365997918 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.