All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss

Essay topics:

All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time
listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how
these considerations shape your position.

Operation strategy of a company is very important for the welfare of the employees and long lasting success of the company. So, it is very important to consider suggestions regarding efficient operating ideas from inside employees and outside consultants. In my opinion, I agree with prompt presented because of the following reasons.

Expertise in a particular field plays an important role for the company. The extensive knowledge possessed by the outside employee is very useful for the progress of the company as an outside consultant would have worked with many more such companies and will be having a good grasp of difficult situations. For instance, a restaurant opened last year is facing problem of less customers. The employees of the restaurant are not able to find a solution to this. However, an outside consultant will easily find a solution to this problem, as he has worked with many such new restaurants before. This clearly shows how hiring an outsider will easily solve some problems.

When it comes to suggestion of employees of the company, a general suggestion is very easy to implement. A company will have employees with varying opinions and it is very difficult to carryout all of them. Rather a unified decision will be more welcomed from the company. However, this may not be possible always. For instance, some junior and mid level employees suggest that, a game zone to be developed inside office for recreation purposes and doing so will increase their productivity. But, the higher management is not in agreement with idea and they think that, it is a waste of money and reduce the efficiency of employees. So, in this case, since different employees are having different opinions, it is very difficult for the company to come to a conclusion. On the other hand, if an outside consultant is hired, he can easily suggest which would work better.

In contrast, some people may argue that investing money on outside consultants is a sheer waste of monetary resources because, people from outside of company are not aware of what is going on inside the company and will not be able to fathom the actual situation. However, this is not true, because an outsider will see a company from a whole different perspective, which has an added advantage. Thus, hiring an outside consultant has definitely some advantage for company.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun customers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...t opened last year is facing problem of less customers. The employees of the restaur...
^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...very difficult to carryout all of them. Rather a unified decision will be more welcome...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...pany. However, this may not be possible always. For instance, some junior and mid leve...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, regarding, so, thus, for instance, in contrast, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02295918367 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76502253045 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.5788191518 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.45 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306401678174 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942156352913 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675253508166 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201374168762 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293021133427 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.