All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
With the advent of time, many new technologies have been invented, there have been many advances which have opened new areas for work and thus creating more jobs. Recently there has been a tremendous growth in the corporate industry with sectors like IT burgeoning due to its extensive need and application. With the increase in number of companies and competition, being efficient is a desideratum for success. A company's performance hugely depends on the strategies it applies, on the operational policies they exercise.
The pros and cons of outsourcing has been a major topic off late. Outsourcing is when a company hires another company to provide a service. Many critics of the outsourcing policy are of the opinion that if companies spend more time heeding to the needs of their own employees and understanding their views, outsourcing would be unnecessary. I do not completely agree with this view because some factors need to be considered before arriving at such a conclusion. Firstly the efficiency that has been mentioned is dependent on a lot of factors. The reason why a company outsources, needs to be understood first.
One of the major reasons for outsourcing is low cost of labor involved. The company would have more expenditure if they were to do the work themselves instead of outsourcing. Thus, it increases operational bandwidth but reduces the profits produced. Another reason for outsourcing is less manpower available. For example - Many companies in the Nordic Region usually outsource and hire external consultants because they do not have the necessary man power available. Thus, outsourcing being the only option available. Delegating work to other companies/consultants free up resources providing an opportunity to focus on new ideas and innovation instead of doing repetitive operational work.
Outsourcing is preferable when a company is relatively new in the market and it does not have the capacity or expertise to be able to perform all tasks on its own, so, hiring expert consultants is the best way to ensure continued smooth operations. That being said, a company should obviously focus on ensuring that they provide their own employees ample platforms to grow. They should listen to the opinions of their employees and encourage such actions. If the company has enough man power and other factors mentioned above then outsourcing can be avoided and they should try to encourage their own employees to step up to taking new responsibilities and increase efficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s less manpower available. For example - Many companies in the Nordic Region usua...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, then, thus, as for, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25870646766 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06710391939 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524875621891 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.4933756338 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352279555982 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103810253769 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739243072497 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213641037305 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446649578119 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.