All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss

Essay topics:

All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position. pend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.

While companies might have very skilled and efficient employees of their own, sometimes it becomes imperative that they hire people with different skillset as temporary outside consultants. Each Company provides some specific service to its customers and always tries to maximize customer satisfaction while also increasing their own profit. In doing so, they might feel the need to hire outside consultants in order to operate more efficiently.

One of the fundamental reasons a company hires outside consultants is to do with the lack of a particular skillset within the company, i.e, their employees. A techfarm mainly consisting of employees who are expert software engineers might need to hire an outside consultant who has very deep knowledge on some hardware which the company might need for developing a product. For example, logitech which is a software-based tech company often hires outside consultants who are experts on microcontroller design to launch their more sophisticated products. The permanent employees of logitech are not familiar with such designs and hence can not develop such products by themselves. In a similar fashion, a business firm might need to temporarily hire skilled software engineers as outside consultants to develop a specific software for their overall inventory management.

Moreover, such temporary consultants are hired on a contract basis. That means the company does not need to pay them a weekly wage like permanent employees. In some cases, a company might need some specific singular task to be completed. Hiring an outside consultant for such a temporary task is more logical than assigning this task to a permanent employee who has to be paid every week. This saves the company its valuable resources and enables it to earn more profit.

However, some companies like to hire outside consultants without any rational reason just to instigate their own employees. Such cases are rare and rather than making the employees more efficient, it makes them disaffected.

In conclusion, a company will sometimes need to hire outside consultants to do a specific a job and also run the company more efficiently.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...company often hires outside consultants who are experts on microcontroller design to la...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar fashion" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ot develop such products by themselves. In a similar fashion, a business firm might need to temporar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37647058824 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93779217055 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488235294118 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7005077202 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408142679919 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15491340648 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655462874294 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261891623325 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206152021822 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.