All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Companies should spend more time listening to their employees. In any workplace, employees play vital roles as they are usually the ones on the frontlines interacting directly with any potential causes of inefficiency in their company's operating structure. Given this proximity to problem causes, they would be in the best position to give accurate information on the causes of inefficiency and even recommend adequate strategies to tackle them.Typically, no one likes to be told by an outsider how best to do their job. Companies calling on outside consultants to suggest ways to operate more efficiently is very likely to make the employees feel undervalued, unreliable and decrease morale which will inevitably lead to low productivity. When companies call on outside consultants, they should be aware that it could have a negative impact on their operation process.Another reason why companies should not call on outside consultants all to often is that this could potentially increase their spends. Companies will save cost when the hire of external consultants is limited or eliminated altogether.Again, how applicable will an outsider be in accessing a problem if the issue is the detachment of the employer or employee or even both to their work. An outside consultant will be in a pinch here.On the other hand, a fresh set of eyes can provide new perspective to tackle the company's challenges efficiently. People generally do better with insightful feedback from others so calling on outside consultants is not all bad - can be the best thing that may happen to a company in some cases.In conclusion, companies need to give their best to figuring out the root of their own problems then take appropropriate measures to remedy them. If this approach does not yield the desired result, then, outside consultants may be the next best way to go.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Typically
...mend adequate strategies to tackle them.Typically, no one likes to be told by an outsider...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 870, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
...ative impact on their operation process.Another reason why companies should not call on...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Again
...nts is limited or eliminated altogether.Again, how applicable will an outsider be in ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...side consultant will be in a pinch here.On the other hand, a fresh set of eyes can...
^^
Line 1, column 1596, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...t may happen to a company in some cases.In conclusion, companies need to give thei...
^^
Line 1, column 1701, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the root of their own problems then take appropropriate measures to remedy them. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, then, in conclusion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09015822002 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.5193221482 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.222222222 118.986275619 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3333333333 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436569519862 0.243740707755 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19483190851 0.0831039109588 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903060348547 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.436569519862 0.150359130593 290% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 14.1392134831 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.