All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Only when a company is facing a major crisis, it will look for bringing in changes. Bringing in outside consultants is necessary in order to improve efficiency at that.
When companies hire outside consultants, they don't just hire a person who will identify the issue, they also hire someone who can help address that issue. These outside consultants are specialized at their jobs- they are quick to find bottlenecks in the company's processes and also are also trained to find the root cause of the issue which should be addressed to improve productivity. If the company were to only listen to its own employees, then, everyone will have their own share of problems- some of which may be trivial. Even if the complaints were important, the management might not have any idea how to fix it. Let us take an example of a company 'A' which listens to feedback from its employees for improving the company's efficacy. John who is an employee might have a problem with the company's appraisal system since he feels that it is unfair to him and if it were unbiased, he would have got a promotion. If the company's management were to listen to him, there is no clear indication of what the problem is and how to fix it. Also, the management's personal opinion towards John will cloud their judgement and prevent them from looking at his complaint from all angles. This is where consultants come into picture. They will audit the company's policies, see the workplace culture and suggest improvements. These improvements may or may not satisfy everyone, because there is no way, everyone can be placated. But, the changes they will bring in will have unbiased view of the company since they are not personally related to or invested in anyone. For them, their job is to work on improving company's policies irrespective of how it may affect one particular person.
Another very important attribute of outside consultants is that they have wide range of experiences. From their past experience, they will know which technique will work and which change will irk the workers. They have learnt from the mistakes and have been enlightened, so that the next company they work for will not have to encounter the same missteps. If the company were to listen to employee feedback and make changes, there is a good chance that it might do more harm than good. Considering the above example of John- say, if John was among a small subset of employees who feel the need for a new appraisal system, then, if the company changes it to accede to their demands, they risk alienating the majority of other workers. Outside consultants will know which request to ignore and which to work on, thus, preventing a major clash of opinions internally. Apart from experience, they can bring in the industry best practices which are successfully employed outside to this company. The management might not even be aware of such practices, and an outside influence will be very welcome.
Like with any action, there are two sides to anything. The outside consultants need to listen to the employee feedback before embarking on changing the policies. They need to understand the workplace culture that is already in place and start working from there, instead of bringing in an alien culture. If they don't, they risk reducing the productivity and worker satisfaction.
Thus, outside consultants bring in an unbiased and experienced ways to improve productivity which is not possible to be done based on employee feedback. Thus, outside consultants provide the company a better chance at being more efficient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ompanies hire outside consultants, they dont just hire a person who will identify th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1060, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...nd how to fix it. Also, the managements personal opinion towards John will cloud their judgement...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...e wide range of experiences. From their past experience, they will know which technique will wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f bringing in an alien culture. If they dont, they risk reducing the productivity an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, then, thus, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2974.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 603.0 442.535393258 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9320066335 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9554069778 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68328526279 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456053067993 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 929.7 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.539422731 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.551724138 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7931034483 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.79310344828 5.21951772744 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306668214758 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917916803546 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660613156552 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179910438734 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831855774496 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.