Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Moral are the basic values or ethics that an individual should have or should take from highly moralize person.It is not about the leader or any esteemed person, it is about every person on earth because these values depicts individuals behaviour and their approach to tackle different problem. Some has said that "Best leader will give best of their judgement only if their have high moral values". So I express disapproval towards the argument that moral values are not important for leader's ability to keep up the respect of his or her peers.
Firstly, it is true that if you give respect to someone then only they will respect you. By giving respect I am not saying that one have to morally good in making judgement, also you need to be diligent towards others i.e. you underscores their point, irrespective of it correctness. For example, we have seen many leader of big coöperate companies, they very modest in nature, they are will always listen to your idea (whether it is poor or elegant). So showing these kind of moral values they gain respect in eyes of their peers. We have seen industrious and eminent leaders in industries, but because of their haughty or scornful behavior towards their peers, are not able to gain respect from their peers.
Admittedly, we have many leader in the world, who are successful leading in their field but they are morally very poor. Although, their peers respect them a lot, the reason for that is their peers are might be impressed by their other qualities. Henceforth, being morally fit will definitely gives an extra edge to any leader.
Conclusion, the funda is simple "give respect implies take respect". It is very important in real-time, for any leader, that their peers should support him at his or her critical decision and this will only happen if they will respect him, which concludes my point that leader has to be morally fit to gain respect from their peers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...should take from highly moralize person.It is not about the leader or any esteemed...
^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[4]
Message: The pronoun 'you' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'underscore'
Suggestion: underscore
... to be diligent towards others i.e. you underscores their point, irrespective of it correct...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun leader seems to be countable; consider using: 'many leaders'.
Suggestion: many leaders
... correctness. For example, we have seen many leader of big coöperate companies, they very m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ether it is poor or elegant. So showing these kind of moral values they gain respect in ey...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun leader seems to be countable; consider using: 'many leaders'.
Suggestion: many leaders
...rom their peers. Admittedly, we have many leader in the world, who are successful leadin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...orth, being morally fit will definitely gives an extra edge to any leader. Conclu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, then, as to, for example, kind of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 331.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88217522659 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50385925323 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519637462236 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.933774565 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.307692308 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253701183385 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105819366122 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748545018902 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182549277591 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528047289471 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.