Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Leader should have a sound moral judgement but what is more important is gaining and maintaining the respect of his or her peers. A leader needs to recognize each and every individuals presence, while acknowledging the fact that everyone under him is important.
A leader only becomes a leader when he gains the trust and respect of his followers. Give Respect and Take Respect, is the mantra the leader needs to follow. Respect of the followers gives an assurance to the leader that the followers will follow their captain till the end irrespective of the hardships or obstacles faced along the journey. This very fact is very crucial as it is not just the leader who has to cross the line of success but the entire team needs to work together to achieve a specific goal with the captain leading in the front. For this to happen a certain amount of trust and respect is most important for a leader to gather amongst his peers.
However, it is also true that decisions cannot be disregarded as not important for a leader. An immoral judgement can have negative effects on the team with the leader losing respect. For example, suppose a leader who is responsoble for taking major decisions of a country brings up a policy agianst the very voters who voted for him during the elections, might endup getting overthrown with protests. This very act of wrong decisons can lead a leader to betray his supporters thereby losing their respect.
Therefore a leader must work on both of the characteristics. With a respectful attitutde for his team and a morally sound judgement with fairness and unbaised opinion can get him more respect from his team mates.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...eader needs to recognize each and every individuals presence, while acknowledging the fact ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ters thereby losing their respect. Therefore a leader must work on both of the chara...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82167832168 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60872202111 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520979020979 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.437723086 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.076923077 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359970531522 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147954994706 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950061341539 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23452823086 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587262362269 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.