An effective leader must possess certain distinct charcter traits, so as to be successful in leading their team in order to achieve their goals. The prompt states that although sound moral judgement is one such crucial characteristic of a leader, it does not supersede the importance of respecting his or her peers. In my opinion, moral judgement is at the apex of essential traits, and that once a leader is morally in a sound space, other traits follow the same path for the following three reasons.
Firstly, moral judgement is an indicator of the value system of a leader. Consquently, the moral beliefs of a person reflect their intentions and desired path to reach success. For instance, Ratan Tata in the past has demonstrated that a sound moral belief system not only aids in gaining public trust and goodwill, it contributes to a much larger purpose within the organisation. Adding to that, the Tata Group, through several philanthropic deeds over the course of more than fifty years, has depicted the importance of taking a utilitarian approach that does maximum good for all. The above example illustrates that sound moral judgement can aid in driving a company to success.
Secondly, in the case of a leader having a sound moral decision making system, his or her peers gain a level of confidence in the leadership style. Furthermore, a sense of trust and respect is instilled in the company culture. Resultantly, the peers feel at ease, and appreciate the way they are treated. For an example, one need look no further than a simple scenario that may occur in any organisation. If one is asked to extend work hours due to excessive load, it is highly likely for one to take the same in a sporting manner if the company dealings are morally sound, rather than in the contrary case. Hence, this only depicts the importance of a sound moral decision making system.
However, it goes without saying that respect is a basic human right, and to be deprived of the same is morally incorrect. Thus, a morally "correct" leader will inadevertently have it ingrained in him/ her to treat his/her peers appropriately with utmost respect. For instance, Steve Jobs, at Apple has created a healthy atmostphere of mutual respect and admiration. In fact, this is a basic result of his fundamental style of leadership, that has now made Apple one of the best companies to work at in the world, owing to its culture. As a result, it can be correctly understood from this example, that a leader with strong morality has a trait of treating all his/ her peers with respect.
Of course some might argue that it is respect that dictates the environment of a company. However, in reality, it is the moral belief system of a leader which impacts the entire company culture, and a sound moral judgement is most likely to result in a respectful environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ssess certain distinct charcter traits, so as to be successful in leading their team in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sporting manner" with adverb for "sporting"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... highly likely for one to take the same in a sporting manner if the company dealings are morally sou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, in fact, of course, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2377.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8609406953 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81013741564 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505112474438 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0070289295 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.19047619 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95238095238 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375997946481 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108303572982 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089133592709 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214585221209 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714785455669 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.